de Haan Lieuwe, van Bruggen Marion, Lavalaye Jules, Booij Jan, Dingemans Peter M A J, Linszen Don
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam Department of Psychiatry, The Netherlands.
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):303-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.303.
The authors tested the hypothesis that a dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy level between 60% and 70% in patients with recent-onset schizophrenia would result in optimal subjective experience. In addition, they sought preliminary evidence on whether subjective experience is better with low-dose olanzapine than with low-dose haloperidol.
Subjects (N=24) who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with either olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, or haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Subjective experience, psychopathology, and extrapyramidal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at endpoint. After 6 weeks, D(2) receptor occupancy was assessed with [(123)I]iodobenzamide single photon emission computed tomography.
The two study groups were similar at baseline. After 6 weeks, patients receiving olanzapine had a significantly lower mean dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy (51.0%, range=36%-67%) than those given haloperidol (65.5%, range=45%-75%). Receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% was associated with optimal subjective experience, and subjective experience improved significantly in the haloperidol group.
A level of D(2) receptor occupancy between 60% and 70% is optimal for subjective experience of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. Substantial interindividual variation in D(2) receptor occupancy was seen at fixed low-dose levels of olanzapine and haloperidol. Olanzapine, 7.5 mg/day, showed no superior subjective response over haloperidol, 2.5 mg/day. Olanzapine may need to be dosed higher than 7.5 mg/day for most patients with recent-onset schizophrenia, and haloperidol needs to be individually titrated in the very low dose range to reach optimal occupancy.
作者检验了这样一种假设,即近期发病的精神分裂症患者多巴胺D(2)受体占有率在60%至70%之间会带来最佳主观体验。此外,他们还寻求初步证据,以探究低剂量奥氮平的主观体验是否优于低剂量氟哌啶醇。
符合精神分裂症DSM-IV标准的受试者(N = 24)被随机分配,接受为期6周的双盲治疗,分别服用7.5毫克/天的奥氮平或2.5毫克/天的氟哌啶醇。在基线期和终点时评估主观体验、精神病理学和锥体外系症状。6周后,用[(123)I]碘苯甲酰胺单光子发射计算机断层扫描评估D(2)受体占有率。
两个研究组在基线时相似。6周后,接受奥氮平治疗的患者平均多巴胺D(2)受体占有率(51.0%,范围 = 36% - 67%)显著低于接受氟哌啶醇治疗的患者(65.5%,范围 = 45% - 75%)。60%至70%的受体占有率与最佳主观体验相关,且氟哌啶醇组的主观体验有显著改善。
60%至70%的D(2)受体占有率水平对近期发病的精神分裂症患者的主观体验最为理想。在奥氮平和氟哌啶醇的固定低剂量水平下,D(2)受体占有率存在显著的个体间差异。7.5毫克/天的奥氮平在主观反应上并不优于2.5毫克/天的氟哌啶醇。对于大多数近期发病的精神分裂症患者,奥氮平可能需要高于7.5毫克/天的剂量,而氟哌啶醇需要在极低剂量范围内进行个体化滴定以达到最佳占有率。