Unger Benjamin, Kemp James S, Wilkins Davida, Psara Rose, Ledbetter Terrance, Graham Michael, Case Mary, Thach Bradley T
Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Pediatrics. 2003 Feb;111(2):E127-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.2.e127.
Racial disparity in rates of death attributable to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been observed for many years. Despite decreased SIDS death rates following the "Back to Sleep" intervention in 1994, this disparity in death rates has increased. The prone sleep position, unsafe sleep surfaces, and sharing a sleep surface with others (bedsharing) increase the risk of sudden infant death. The race-specific prevalence of these modifiable risk factors in sudden unexpected infant deaths-including SIDS, accidental suffocation (AS), and cause of death undetermined (UD)-has not been investigated in a population-based study. Death rates attributable to AS and UD are also higher in African Americans (AAs) than in other races (non-AA). The potential contribution of unsafe sleep practices to this overall disparity in death rates is uncertain.
The objective of this study was to compare death rates attributable to SIDS and related causes of death (AS and UD) in AA and non-AA infants and the prevalence of unsafe sleep practices at time of death. Our hypothesis was that there is a large racial disparity in these modifiable risk factors at the time of death, and that public awareness of this could lead to improved intervention strategies to reduce the disparity in death rates.
In this population-based study, we retrospectively reviewed death-scene information and medical examiners' investigations of deaths in St Louis City and County between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1997. The deaths of all infants <2 years old with the diagnoses of SIDS, AS, or UD were included. Sleep surfaces other than those specifically designed and approved for infant use were termed nonstandard (adult beds, sofas, etc). Denominators for our rate estimates were the number of births (AA and non-AA) in St Louis City and County during the study period.
The deaths of 119 infants were studied (81 AA and 38 non-AA). SIDS rates were much higher in AA than non-AA infants (2.08 vs 0.65 per 1000 live births), as was the rate of AS (0.47 vs 0.06). There was a trend for increased deaths diagnosed as UD in AA infants (0.36 vs 0.06). Bedsharing deaths were nearly twice as common in AAs (67.1% vs 35.1% of deaths), as were deaths on nonstandard sleep surfaces (79.0% vs 46.0%). Forty-nine percent (49.1%) of all infants who died while bedsharing were found on their backs or sides compared with 20.4% of infants who were not bedsharing. Overall, the fraction of infants found in these nonprone positions was not different for AA infants and non-AA infants (43.3% vs 38.5%). In AA and non-AA infants, factors that greatly increase the risk of bedsharing, such as sofa sharing or all-night bedsharing, were present in all or many bedsharing deaths.
Among AA infants dying suddenly and unexpectedly, the high prevalence of nonstandard bed use and bedsharing may underlie, in part, their increased death rates. Public health messages tailored for the AA community have stressed first and foremost using nonprone sleep positions. The observation that there was no difference between AA and non-AA infants in position found at death suggests that racial disparity in sleep position is not the most important contributor to racial disparity in death rates. The finding that more infants died on their back or side while bedsharing than otherwise suggests that these sleep positions are less protective when associated with bedsharing. We conclude that public health information tailored for the AA community should give equal emphasis to risks and alternatives to bedsharing as to avoidance of the prone position.
多年来一直观察到因婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)导致的死亡率存在种族差异。尽管1994年“仰睡”干预措施实施后SIDS死亡率有所下降,但死亡率的这种差异却有所增加。俯卧睡眠姿势、不安全的睡眠表面以及与他人共用睡眠表面(同床睡眠)会增加婴儿猝死的风险。在一项基于人群的研究中,尚未对这些可改变的风险因素在婴儿意外猝死(包括SIDS、意外窒息(AS)和死因不明(UD))中的种族特异性患病率进行调查。非裔美国人(AA)中因AS和UD导致的死亡率也高于其他种族(非AA)。不安全睡眠习惯对这种总体死亡率差异的潜在影响尚不确定。
本研究的目的是比较AA和非AA婴儿中SIDS及相关死因(AS和UD)的死亡率以及死亡时不安全睡眠习惯的患病率。我们的假设是,在死亡时这些可改变的风险因素存在很大的种族差异,并且公众对此的认识可能会导致改进干预策略以减少死亡率差异。
在这项基于人群的研究中,我们回顾性地审查了1994年1月1日至1997年12月31日期间圣路易斯市和圣路易斯县的死亡现场信息和法医对死亡情况的调查。纳入所有诊断为SIDS、AS或UD的2岁以下婴儿的死亡情况。除专门为婴儿设计和批准使用的睡眠表面外的其他睡眠表面被称为非标准(成人床、沙发等)。我们率估计的分母是研究期间圣路易斯市和圣路易斯县的出生人数(AA和非AA)。
研究了119名婴儿的死亡情况(81名AA婴儿和38名非AA婴儿)。AA婴儿的SIDS率远高于非AA婴儿(每1000例活产中分别为2.08例和0.65例),AS率也是如此(0.47例对0.06例)。AA婴儿中诊断为UD的死亡人数有增加的趋势(0.36例对0.06例)。同床睡眠死亡在AA婴儿中几乎是非AA婴儿的两倍(分别占死亡人数的67.1%和35.1%),在非标准睡眠表面上死亡的情况也是如此(79.0%对46.0%)。在所有同床睡眠死亡的婴儿中,49%(49.1%)被发现仰卧或侧卧,而非同床睡眠的婴儿中这一比例为20.4%。总体而言,AA婴儿和非AA婴儿中处于这些非俯卧姿势的比例没有差异(43.3%对38.5%)。在AA和非AA婴儿中,所有或许多同床睡眠死亡中都存在极大增加同床睡眠风险的因素,如共用沙发或整夜同床睡眠。
在突然意外死亡的AA婴儿中,非标准床的使用和同床睡眠的高患病率可能部分是其死亡率增加的原因。针对AA社区的公共卫生信息首先强调使用非俯卧睡眠姿势。在死亡时发现的姿势上AA和非AA婴儿之间没有差异这一观察结果表明,睡眠姿势的种族差异不是死亡率种族差异的最重要因素。与非同床睡眠相比,更多婴儿在同床睡眠时仰卧或侧卧死亡这一发现表明,当与同床睡眠相关时,这些睡眠姿势的保护作用较小。我们得出结论,针对AA社区的公共卫生信息应同样重视同床睡眠的风险和替代方法以及避免俯卧姿势。