Sánchez-Ramón Silvia, Bellón José Ma, Resino Salvador, Cantó-Nogués Carmen, Gurbindo Dolores, Ramos José-Tomás, Muñoz-Fernández Ma Angeles
Unit of Neuroimmunology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Pediatrics. 2003 Feb;111(2):E168-75. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.2.e168.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-associated progressive encephalopathy (PE) is a common and devastating complication of HIV-1 infection in children, whose risk factors have not yet been clearly defined. Regardless of the age of presentation, PE shortens life expectancy. Paradoxically, as survival of patients has been prolonged as a result of the use of antiretroviral therapy, the prevalence of PE has increased. Therefore, a predictive marker of PE emergence is critical. The objective of this study was to determine in an observational study whether any immunologic (CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocyte counts, monocyte counts) or virologic (viral load [VL], biological characteristics of viral isolates) marker might be predictive of PE and whether any particular marker may be involved in the timing of clinical onset of PE.
A total of 189 children who were vertically infected with HIV-1 were studied retrospectively, 58 of whom fulfilled criteria of the American Academy of Neurology for PE. T-lymphocyte subsets and monocytes in peripheral blood were quantified by flow cytometry. HIV-1 RNA was measured in plasma using a quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay. Demographic, clinical, and viro-immunologic characteristics in infants were compared with control groups using logistic regression. Proportions were compared using the chi(2) test or Fisher exact test. For each child, immunologic and virologic markers were analyzed in parallel closely before clinical onset of PE and closely after PE onset and compared by using the Student t test for paired samples.
Overall, mortality of 58 HIV-1-infected children who developed PE was significantly higher than of children who did not develop this complication. Blood CD8(+) T-lymphocytes <25% in the first months of life suggested a relative risk of progressing to PE 4-fold higher than those with CD8(+) >25% (95% confidence interval: 1.2-13.9) and remained statistically significant after adjustment for treatment. When we compared the PE-positive group with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)/PE-negative group (children who developed clinical category C and without neurologic manifestations) in a cross-sectional study within 12 months before PE or AIDS diagnosis, respectively, the %CD8(+) T-lymphocytes were significantly lower in the PE-positive group. Normalized absolute counts of CD8(+) T-lymphocytes with respect to seroreverting children were significantly lower in the group of children with encephalopathy with respect to the AIDS/PE-negative group (data not shown). It is interesting that a statistically significant increase was observed in circulating monocyte percentages and absolute counts shortly before the first neurologic symptoms compared with values after PE was established and with those from HIV-1-infected controls. With respect to AIDS-related events, PE was strongly associated with anemia and lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis in the PE-positive group with respect to a group of children with AIDS but without PE.
HIV-1 infection of the central nervous system (CNS) remains an important clinical concern. The first step toward PE prevention in HIV-1-infected children should be directed at predicting risk of PE and thus the prompt and reliable identification of infants who are at risk for CNS disease progression. Low blood CD8(+) T-lymphocytes is a strong early predictive marker of PE emergence in vertical HIV-1 infection. Indeed, among all of the immunologic and virologic variables assessed in this observational study, the only significant difference during the first months of life are the CD8(+) T-lymphocytes. A peak of significantly higher peripheral monocytes before the onset of PE with respect to established PE has not been previously described, and strengthens the growing evidence that an increased traffic of monocytes to the brain may be a key factor in triggering neurologic symptoms. The suppression of HIV-1 replication is dependent on the presence of a relatively small number of HIV-1-specifof HIV-1-specific CD8(+) T-lymphocytes, and it is possible that the duration of the neurologically asymptomatic phase for any given child may depend mostly on the magnitude of specific CD8(+) T-lymphocyte responses. Thus, a decrease of CD8(+) T-lymphocytes would diminish the host capacity to control viral infection, as reported in animal models, enabling infected macrophages to cross the blood-brain barrier. Our results advocate the use of CD8(+) T-lymphocyte and monocyte counts to follow-up HIV-1-infected children. We suggest that CD8(+) T-lymphocytes may be the nexus for many different aspects of the disease, namely loss of control of HIV-1 replication determining higher VL, increased traffic of activated and/or infected monocytes, spread of infection to immune sanctuaries, and finally clinical neurologic emergence of PE. Moreover, we suggest that CD8(+) T-lymphocytes or/and monocytes may be used as putative biological markers of neuropathogenicity. This might suggest their use in decision making of when to start more effective antiretroviral regimens for HIV-1 infection of the CNS and the need of new therapies either to preserve or to augment an adequate CD8(+) T-lymphocyte immune response. Early detection of children who are at risk for developing PE is particularly important because aggressive highly active antiretroviral therapy improves neurologic symptoms, allows possible use of neuroprotective treatment to prevent further development of encephalopathy, and emphasizes the relevance of developing therapies aimed to enhance CD8(+) T-lymphocyte function. In conclusion, the surrogate markers routinely used in clinical practice for HIV-1 infection (ie, CD4(+) T-lymphocyte counts and VL) seem to be insufficient to evaluate the clinical involvement of the CNS. Other systemic markers, as the recent proposed markers for PE evolution (cerebrospinal fluid VL by lumbar puncture and brain atrophy by cerebral magnetic resonance imaging) are undoubtedly more invasive than measuring CD8(+) T-lymphocyte and monocyte counts, when the neurologic manifestations of PE are still preventable.
1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)相关的进行性脑病(PE)是儿童HIV-1感染常见且严重的并发症,其危险因素尚未明确界定。无论发病年龄如何,PE都会缩短预期寿命。矛盾的是,由于使用抗逆转录病毒疗法使患者生存期延长,PE的患病率却有所增加。因此,PE发生的预测标志物至关重要。本研究的目的是在一项观察性研究中确定任何免疫指标(CD4⁺和CD8⁺T淋巴细胞计数、单核细胞计数)或病毒学指标(病毒载量[VL]、病毒分离株的生物学特性)是否可预测PE,以及是否有任何特定指标与PE临床发病时间有关。
对189例母婴垂直感染HIV-1的儿童进行回顾性研究,其中58例符合美国神经病学学会PE的标准。采用流式细胞术对外周血中的T淋巴细胞亚群和单核细胞进行定量分析。使用定量逆转录聚合酶链反应法检测血浆中的HIV-1 RNA。采用逻辑回归分析将婴儿的人口统计学、临床和病毒免疫学特征与对照组进行比较。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较比例。对每个儿童,在PE临床发病前和发病后不久分别平行分析免疫和病毒学标志物,并使用配对样本的Student t检验进行比较。
总体而言,58例发生PE的HIV-1感染儿童的死亡率显著高于未发生该并发症的儿童。出生后最初几个月血液中CD8⁺T淋巴细胞<25%提示进展为PE的相对风险比CD8⁺>25%的儿童高4倍(95%置信区间:1.2 - 13.9),在调整治疗因素后仍具有统计学意义。在PE或艾滋病诊断前12个月内分别进行的横断面研究中,将PE阳性组与获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)/PE阴性组(出现临床C类症状但无神经学表现的儿童)进行比较时,PE阳性组的CD8⁺T淋巴细胞百分比显著更低。与AIDS/PE阴性组相比,脑病儿童组相对于血清学转阴儿童的CD8⁺T淋巴细胞标准化绝对计数显著更低(数据未显示)。有趣的是,与PE确诊后及HIV-1感染对照组的值相比,在首次出现神经学症状前不久,循环单核细胞百分比和绝对计数出现统计学显著增加。关于艾滋病相关事件,与一组患有艾滋病但无PE的儿童相比,PE阳性组的PE与贫血和淋巴样间质性肺炎密切相关。
HIV-1感染中枢神经系统(CNS)仍然是一个重要的临床问题。预防HIV-1感染儿童发生PE的第一步应针对预测PE风险,从而迅速、可靠地识别有CNS疾病进展风险的婴儿。低血液CD8⁺T淋巴细胞是母婴垂直感染HIV-1时PE发生的强有力早期预测标志物。实际上,在本观察性研究评估的所有免疫和病毒学变量中,出生后最初几个月唯一的显著差异是CD8⁺T淋巴细胞。在PE发作前外周单核细胞显著高于已确诊PE时的峰值此前尚未见报道,这进一步证明越来越多的证据表明单核细胞向脑内的流量增加可能是引发神经学症状的关键因素。HIV-1复制的抑制依赖于相对少量的HIV-1特异性CD8⁺T淋巴细胞的存在,并且对于任何给定儿童,神经学无症状期的持续时间可能主要取决于特异性CD8⁺T淋巴细胞反应的强度。因此,如动物模型中所报道,CD8⁺T淋巴细胞减少会削弱宿主控制病毒感染的能力,使受感染的巨噬细胞能够穿过血脑屏障。我们的结果支持使用CD8⁺T淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数对HIV-1感染儿童进行随访。我们认为CD8⁺T淋巴细胞可能是该疾病许多不同方面的关键环节,即HIV-1复制失控导致更高的病毒载量、活化和/或感染的单核细胞流量增加、感染扩散至免疫庇护所,最终临床出现PE的神经学症状。此外,我们认为CD8⁺T淋巴细胞或/和单核细胞可作为神经致病性的假定生物学标志物。这可能提示它们在决定何时开始针对CNS的HIV-1感染采用更有效的抗逆转录病毒方案以及是否需要新的疗法以维持或增强适当的CD8⁺T淋巴细胞免疫反应方面的应用。早期发现有发生PE风险的儿童尤为重要,因为积极的高效抗逆转录病毒疗法可改善神经学症状,允许可能使用神经保护治疗以预防脑病的进一步发展,并强调开发旨在增强CD8⁺T淋巴细胞功能的疗法的相关性。总之,临床实践中常规用于HIV-1感染的替代标志物(即CD4⁺T淋巴细胞计数和病毒载量)似乎不足以评估CNS的临床受累情况。当PE的神经学表现仍可预防时,其他全身标志物,如最近提出的用于PE进展的标志物(通过腰椎穿刺检测脑脊液病毒载量和通过脑磁共振成像检测脑萎缩)无疑比测量CD8⁺T淋巴细胞和单核细胞计数更具侵入性。