Honderick Tim, Williams David, Seaberg David, Wears Robert
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, FL 32610, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;21(1):39-42. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2003.50010.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the use of lorazepam plus nitroglycerine (NTG) versus NTG alone in the reduction of cocaine induced chest pain in the emergency department. The secondary objective of the study was to help determine the safety of lorazepam in the treatment of cocaine- associated chest pain. The study was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial conducted at an university-affiliated urban emergency department (ED). All patients who presented with cocaine-associated chest pain were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included age greater than 45 years, documented coronary artery disease, chest pain of more than 72 hours duration, or pretreatment with nitroglycerin. Patients were given either sublingual nitroglycerine (SL NTG) (Group 1) or SL NTG plus 1 mg of lorazepam intravenously (Group 2) every 5 minutes for a total of 2 doses. Chest pain was recorded on an ordinal scale of 0 to 10 at baseline, and then at 5 minutes after each dose. Adverse reactions to medication were also recorded. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The average age of these subjects was 34.1 years, and 67% were men. The NTG-only group consisted of 15 patients and the NTG-plus-lorazepam group consisted of 12 patients. Baseline mean chest-pain scores were 6.87 in Group 1 and 6.54 in Group 2, with no differences between groups. Five minutes after initial treatment, mean scores for the two groups were 5.2 and 3.9, respectively, with a difference in means of 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.8-3.8). Five minutes after the second treatment, the mean scores were 4.6 and 1.5, respectively, with a difference in means of 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-5). Kruskal-Wallis testing showed a significant difference in pain relief between the two study groups (P =.003), with greater pain relief noted at 5 and 10 minutes in the NTG-plus-lorazepam group (P =.02 and P =.005, respectively). All patients in the study were admitted to the hospital, but no patient in either group had an acute myocardial infarction or cardiac complications in the ED. No adverse side effects were noted for either group. The early use of lorazepam with NTG was more efficacious than NTG alone, and appears to be safe in relieving cocaine-associated chest pain.
本研究的目的是比较在急诊科使用劳拉西泮加硝酸甘油(NTG)与单独使用NTG来减轻可卡因诱发的胸痛的效果。该研究的次要目的是帮助确定劳拉西泮治疗可卡因相关性胸痛的安全性。本研究是在一所大学附属的城市急诊科进行的一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、对照试验。所有出现可卡因相关性胸痛的患者均被纳入研究。排除标准包括年龄大于45岁、有记录的冠状动脉疾病、胸痛持续时间超过72小时或已接受硝酸甘油预处理。患者每5分钟接受一次舌下硝酸甘油(SL NTG)(第1组)或SL NTG加1毫克静脉注射劳拉西泮(第2组),共给药2次。在基线时以及每次给药后5分钟,用0至10的序数量表记录胸痛情况。还记录了药物的不良反应。27名患者符合纳入标准并被纳入研究。这些受试者的平均年龄为34.1岁,67%为男性。仅使用NTG组有15名患者,NTG加劳拉西泮组有12名患者。第1组的基线平均胸痛评分为6.87,第2组为6.54,两组之间无差异。初始治疗后5分钟,两组的平均评分分别为5.2和3.9,平均差异为1.24(95%置信区间[CI] -0.8 - 3.8)。第二次治疗后5分钟,平均评分分别为4.6和1.5,平均差异为3.1(95% CI 1.2 - 5)。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示两个研究组之间在疼痛缓解方面存在显著差异(P = 0.003),NTG加劳拉西泮组在5分钟和10分钟时疼痛缓解更明显(分别为P = 0.02和P = 0.005)。研究中的所有患者均被收住入院,但两组在急诊科均无患者发生急性心肌梗死或心脏并发症。两组均未观察到不良副作用。早期联合使用劳拉西泮和NTG比单独使用NTG更有效,且在缓解可卡因相关性胸痛方面似乎是安全的。