• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[甲状腺切除术与喉返神经损伤]

[Thyroidectomy and injury of recurrent laryngeal nerve].

作者信息

Gao X, Zhao D A, Huang W G, Dou K F, Yuan J, Zhao Y J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710033.

出版信息

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2000 Jul;14(7):315-6.

PMID:12563884
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study factors related to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) paralysis, a major complication of thyroidectomy.

METHOD

Retrospective study of outcome of patient's medical records in Xijing Hospital and Tumor Hospital of Liaoning Province. Records of 1,563 patients who underwent thyroidectomy by departments of general surgery, ENT and head & neck surgery at these two hospitals were reviewed for RLN paralysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

RLN injury was analyzed in relation to types of surgery, RLN identification, and histopathology.

RESULT

The incidence of RLN paralysis was 7.8%, and significantly related to the histopathologic findings of malignancy (P < 0.01). The positive identification and prevention of RLN would not be in either permanent RLN paralysis or temporary RLN paralysis, and the types of surgery were not found to be significant factors in both paralysis.

CONCLUSION

RLNs should be identified to avoid iatrogenic injury and subsequent paralysis, and meticulous surgical technique should be applied in patients whose results of biopsy suggested malignancy.

摘要

目的

研究甲状腺切除术后主要并发症喉返神经(RLN)麻痹的相关因素。

方法

对西京医院和辽宁省肿瘤医院患者病历结果进行回顾性研究。回顾了这两家医院普通外科、耳鼻喉科和头颈外科进行甲状腺切除术的1563例患者的病历,以了解喉返神经麻痹情况。

主要观察指标

分析喉返神经损伤与手术类型、喉返神经识别及组织病理学的关系。

结果

喉返神经麻痹发生率为7.8%,与恶性肿瘤的组织病理学结果显著相关(P<0.01)。喉返神经的正确识别和预防对永久性或暂时性喉返神经麻痹均无影响,且手术类型在两种麻痹中均未被发现是重要因素。

结论

应识别喉返神经以避免医源性损伤及随后的麻痹,对于活检结果提示恶性肿瘤的患者应采用细致的手术技术。

相似文献

1
[Thyroidectomy and injury of recurrent laryngeal nerve].[甲状腺切除术与喉返神经损伤]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2000 Jul;14(7):315-6.
2
Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis: a complication of thyroidectomy.喉返神经麻痹:甲状腺切除术的一种并发症。
J Otolaryngol. 1997 Dec;26(6):365-7.
3
Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and preservation in thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术中喉返神经损伤与保护
Saudi Med J. 2005 Nov;26(11):1746-9.
4
Value of recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in the operative strategy during total thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy.喉返神经监测在甲状腺全切除及甲状旁腺手术中的应用价值。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013 Jun;130(3):131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.09.007. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
5
The role of intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy: a comparative study on 1000 nerves at risk.甲状腺切除术中喉返神经术中神经监测的作用:对1000条有风险神经的比较研究
Surgery. 2006 Dec;140(6):866-72; discussion 872-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.017. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
6
Effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve identification technique in thyroidectomy on recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and hypoparathyroidism.甲状腺切除术中喉返神经识别技术对喉返神经麻痹和甲状旁腺功能减退的影响。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Sep;137(9):897-900. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.134. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
7
[Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury following thyroid surgery].[甲状腺手术后喉返神经损伤]
Przegl Lek. 2004;61(1):13-6.
8
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroidectomy with routine identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.甲状腺切除术中常规识别喉返神经后出现的喉返神经麻痹
Surgery. 2005 Mar;137(3):342-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.09.008.
9
Risk factors for permanent laryngeal nerve paralysis in patients with thyroid carcinoma.甲状腺癌患者永久性喉返神经麻痹的危险因素。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Oct;32(5):378-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2007.01536.x.
10
Continuous laryngeal nerve integrity monitoring during thyroidectomy: does it reduce risk of injury?甲状腺切除术中喉返神经完整性的连续监测:它能降低损伤风险吗?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov;131(5):596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.05.030.