Gessert C E, Forbes S, Bern-Klug M
Division of Education and Research, St. Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System, 400 East Third Street, Duluth, MN 55805-1983, USA.
Omega (Westport). 2000;42(4):273-91. doi: 10.2190/2mt2-5gyu-gxvv-95ne.
We examined families' end-of-life decision making and their interactions with health professionals. Twenty-eight family members of institutionalized dementia patients participated in four focus groups. We found that participating family members were not well prepared for their decision-making roles, and that they: 1) experienced substantial burdens and loss in caring for institutionalized elders; 2) had limited understanding of the natural progression of dementing conditions; 3) were uncomfortable in setting goals for their relatives' end-of-life care; 4) had little experience with death, and were ambivalent about the anticipated death of their relative; and (5) reported that they had little substantive communication with health professionals regarding end-of-life care planning. We concluded that many of the needs of such families could be addressed through improved application of the principles of advance care planning, including regular structured discussions, involvement of surrogate decision-makers, and anticipation of clinical decisions. Health professionals should take the lead in 'normalizing' the discussion of death.
我们研究了家庭的临终决策制定以及他们与医疗专业人员的互动情况。28名机构化痴呆患者的家庭成员参与了四个焦点小组。我们发现,参与研究的家庭成员对其决策角色准备不足,并且他们:1)在照顾机构化老人方面承受了巨大负担并遭受了损失;2)对痴呆病情的自然发展进程了解有限;3)在为亲属的临终护理设定目标时感到不自在;4)几乎没有死亡方面的经历,对亲属预期的死亡感到矛盾;以及(5)报告称他们在临终护理规划方面与医疗专业人员几乎没有实质性沟通。我们得出结论,通过更好地应用预先护理规划原则,包括定期进行结构化讨论、让替代决策者参与以及对临床决策进行预判,可以满足此类家庭的许多需求。医疗专业人员应带头使关于死亡的讨论“常态化”。