Suppr超能文献

季节性前桦树/榛子舌下免疫疗法可改善双敏个体中草花粉注射治疗的效果。一项病例对照、为期两年的对照研究。

A pre-seasonal birch/hazel sublingual immunotherapy can improve the outcome of grass pollen injective treatment in bisensitized individuals. A case-referent, two-year controlled study.

作者信息

Cirla A M, Cirla P E, Parmiani S, Pecora S

机构信息

Istituti Ospitalieri, Center for Environmental Allergy, Cremona, Italy.

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0546(03)79161-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study tests the hypothesis of a reduction of priming due to tree allergy in patients sensitised to both birch/hazel and grass pollen undergoing an associated preseasonal Sublingual/Injective immunotherapy.

METHODS

36 out of 49 bisensitized candidates were pair-matched into 18 case-referent couples. During two years all patients were administered preseasonal grass-SIT and one patient in each couple received also birch/hazel-SLIT. Diary cards were fulfilled for three consecutive grass pollen seasons. Specific Nasal Provocation Test (NPT) for grass and aspecific bronchial challenge were done; sera were analyzed for specific IgE and IgG.

RESULTS

During the peak of the grass pollen season both groups showed a significant improvement in total symptom-score. Conjunctivitis and cough improved significantly more in patients with associated therapies. While antihistamine score decreased significantly in both groups, antiasthmatics did only in the SLIT-SIT group. The follow-up documented a significant increase in grass- and birch-specific IgG and a decrease in grass-specific IgE. Grass-NPT threshold was clearly higher in SLIT-SIT-group (p = 0.01) and only in this group PD20 methacholine improved significantly (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined birch/hazel-SLIT and grass-SIT are safe and improve clinical outcomes of SIT alone in young bisensitized patients. Priming reduction is supported by specific NPT and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证一个假设,即对于同时对桦树/榛树花粉和草花粉过敏的患者,在进行相关的季节性前舌下/注射免疫治疗时,因树木过敏导致的激发反应会降低。

方法

49名双重致敏的候选者中有36名被配对成18对病例对照组合。在两年时间里,所有患者都接受了季节性前草花粉特异性免疫治疗(SIT),每对组合中的一名患者还接受了桦树/榛树花粉舌下免疫治疗(SLIT)。连续三个草花粉季节填写日记卡。进行了草花粉特异性鼻激发试验(NPT)和非特异性支气管激发试验;分析血清中的特异性IgE和IgG。

结果

在草花粉季节高峰期,两组的总症状评分均有显著改善。联合治疗的患者结膜炎和咳嗽改善更为显著。虽然两组的抗组胺药评分均显著降低,但仅舌下免疫治疗联合特异性免疫治疗组的平喘药评分降低。随访记录显示草花粉和桦树特异性IgG显著增加,草花粉特异性IgE降低。舌下免疫治疗联合特异性免疫治疗组的草花粉NPT阈值明显更高(p = 0.01),且只有该组的乙酰甲胆碱PD20显著改善(p < 0.05)。

结论

在年轻的双重致敏患者中,联合桦树/榛树花粉舌下免疫治疗和草花粉特异性免疫治疗是安全的,且能改善单独特异性免疫治疗的临床效果。特异性鼻激发试验和支气管高反应性支持激发反应降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验