Palma-Carlos A G, Santos A S, Branco-Ferreira M, Pregal A L, Palma-Carlos M L, Bruno M E, Falagiani P, Riva G
Clinical Allergy Immunology Center, CAIC, Lisbon, Portugal.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2006 Sep-Oct;34(5):194-8. doi: 10.1157/13094026.
The aim of this study was to confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of a preseasonal sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in a group of allergic patients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild intermittent or mild persistent asthma. The immunotherapy was administered through the oral mucosa with a monomeric carbamylated allergoid (allergoid SLIT) for grass pollens. A secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of the allergoid SLIT on nasal reactivity.
A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed. Patients were selected and randomly allocated to two groups: one group received active treatment (allergoid SLIT) for 2 years and the other received placebo. Both groups received the necessary drug treatment throughout the trial. Thirty-three outpatients (20 men and 13 women, mean age: 30 years; range: 19-43) attending our center were enrolled in the study. Symptoms and medications were scored on diary cards during the pollen season. An allergen nasal challenge was performed at baseline and after 2 years of SLIT to evaluate nasal reactivity. Because the clinical scores were non-normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney and the Chi-square tests for intergroup comparisons and the Wilcoxon test for intragroup comparisons were used. The results were evaluated after 1 and 2 years of treatment. Between the first and second years of treatment, no changes in the scores for the placebo group were found, while for the active vaccine group significant decreases were found in rhinorrhea (p < 0.03), sneezing (p < 0.03), and conjunctivitis (p < 0.02). Symptom scores after nasal challenge decreased (p < 0.03) after 2 years' treatment. Nasal steroid use significantly decreased in the active treatment group during May and June in both the years of treatment (p < 0.02). Only two mild local adverse events were reported in the active group and none was reported in the placebo group.
The results of this study show that the allergoid SLIT is safe and effective in decreasing symptom scores and drug use in rhinitic patients allergic to grass pollen.
本研究的目的是证实季前舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)在一组患有季节性变应性鼻结膜炎伴或不伴轻度间歇性或轻度持续性哮喘的变应性患者中的临床疗效和安全性。免疫疗法通过口服黏膜给予草花粉的单体氨甲酰化变应原疫苗(变应原疫苗SLIT)。次要终点是评估变应原疫苗SLIT对鼻反应性的影响。
进行了一项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。选择患者并随机分为两组:一组接受为期2年的积极治疗(变应原疫苗SLIT),另一组接受安慰剂治疗。在整个试验过程中,两组均接受必要的药物治疗。33名门诊患者(20名男性和13名女性,平均年龄:30岁;范围:19 - 43岁)到我们中心就诊并纳入研究。在花粉季节,通过日记卡对症状和用药情况进行评分。在基线时以及SLIT治疗2年后进行变应原鼻激发试验以评估鼻反应性。由于临床评分呈非正态分布,组间比较采用曼 - 惠特尼检验和卡方检验,组内比较采用威尔科克森检验。在治疗1年和2年后评估结果。在治疗的第一年和第二年之间,安慰剂组的评分没有变化,而活性疫苗组的鼻漏(p < 0.03)、打喷嚏(p < 0.03)和结膜炎(p < 0.02)评分显著降低。治疗2年后,鼻激发试验后的症状评分降低(p < 0.03)。在治疗的两年中,5月和6月期间,活性治疗组的鼻用类固醇使用量显著减少(p < 0.02)。活性组仅报告了两例轻度局部不良事件,安慰剂组未报告任何不良事件。
本研究结果表明,变应原疫苗SLIT在降低对草花粉过敏的鼻炎患者的症状评分和药物使用方面是安全有效的。