Uriarte María, Reeve Hudson Kern
Institute of Ecosystem Studies, P.O. Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1787-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337167100. Epub 2003 Feb 7.
Theories developed to explain the processes that govern the assembly and composition of natural plant communities can be divided into two broad categories. Niche-based theories propose that coevolutionary changes among species lead to character divergence (displacement), which allows for coexistence by partitioning resources among species. In contrast, ecological-drift theories propose that species diversity results from a balance of migration, speciation, and extinction, with little microevolutionary change. We use a game-theory model to reconcile drift and niche perspectives by developing a theory of species "marriage." Initially, ecological drift may determine which species encounter each other in a competitive arena. Once species come into contact, historical niche development as a result of prior coevolutionary molding of competitive ability determines which species may coexist. The model shows that only species that display the well-known tradeoff between seed size and competitive ability as a result of past competitive histories comply with the requisite for mutual evolutionary stability. Mutual evolutionary stability of competitive ability tends to make reproductive outputs more similar between species, increasing the chances of ecological equilibrium, i.e., the coexistence of species competing for a single resource. Moreover, mutual evolutionary stability guarantees that such an ecological equilibrium will be stable. The species-marriage model predicts that two or more plant species will coexist indefinitely (i.e., "marry") when their difference in seed size, their densities, and the resource availability obey a specific quantitative relation. For example, when resource availability is high, married species should be characterized by a greater asymmetry in seed size than when resource availability is low. Thus, in the species-marriage model, competition can shape the detailed properties of communities without violating the postulates of ecological-drift theory.
为解释自然植物群落的组装和组成过程而发展出的理论可大致分为两大类。基于生态位的理论认为,物种间的共同进化变化会导致性状趋异(取代),从而通过在物种间分配资源实现共存。相比之下,生态漂变理论认为物种多样性源于迁移、物种形成和灭绝的平衡,几乎没有微观进化变化。我们使用博弈论模型,通过发展一种物种“婚姻”理论来调和漂变和生态位观点。最初,生态漂变可能决定哪些物种在竞争环境中相遇。一旦物种接触,由于先前竞争能力的共同进化塑造而产生的历史生态位发展决定了哪些物种可能共存。该模型表明,只有那些由于过去的竞争历史而在种子大小和竞争能力之间表现出众所周知的权衡的物种,才符合相互进化稳定性的要求。竞争能力的相互进化稳定性往往会使物种间的繁殖输出更加相似,增加生态平衡的机会,即竞争单一资源的物种共存。此外,相互进化稳定性保证了这种生态平衡将是稳定的。物种婚姻模型预测,当两个或多个植物物种的种子大小差异、密度和资源可用性服从特定的定量关系时,它们将无限期共存(即“结婚”)。例如,当资源可用性高时,“结婚”物种的种子大小不对称性应比资源可用性低时更大。因此,在物种婚姻模型中,竞争可以塑造群落的详细特性,而不违反生态漂变理论的假设。