Levin Phillip D, Sheinin Olga, Gozal Yaacov
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb;31(2):481-4. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050452.17304.2F.
To assess the role of a portable ultrasound device in the insertion of radial artery catheters.
Prospective, randomized, comparative study.
Tertiary university hospital.
Elective surgery patients requiring arterial catheter insertion for intraoperative monitoring.
A portable ultrasound device was used to visualize the radial artery at the wrist and to direct arterial catheter insertion. This new technique of arterial catheter insertion was compared with the classic palpation technique.
A total of 69 patients requiring an arterial catheter were randomized to either the ultrasound (34 patients) or palpation technique (35 patients). The time taken from skin puncture to successful arterial catheter insertion, the time taken per insertion attempt, the number of attempts required, and the number of cannulae used were recorded for each group. The arterial cannula was inserted on the first attempt in 21 (62%) cases using ultrasound vs. 12 (34%) cases by palpation (p =.03). Significantly fewer attempts were required for catheter insertion using ultrasound as compared with palpation (mean +/- sd, 1.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.1 +/- 2.4; p=.003); however, the time taken for each successful attempt was longer (26.1 +/- 2.0 vs. 17.3 +/- 1.6 secs, p=.001). A trend toward shorter overall time required for catheter insertion was found for the ultrasound group (55.5 +/- 63.8 vs. 111.5 +/- 121.5 secs, p=.17). There were four failures in the ultrasound group and one in the palpation group (not significant).
Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to arterial catheter insertion and increases the rate of success at first attempt. The technique is easy to learn and may reduce the time taken to insert the catheter.
评估便携式超声设备在桡动脉导管插入术中的作用。
前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
三级大学医院。
需要在术中进行监测而接受动脉导管插入术的择期手术患者。
使用便携式超声设备观察腕部桡动脉并指导动脉导管插入。将这种新的动脉导管插入技术与传统的触诊技术进行比较。
总共69例需要动脉导管的患者被随机分为超声组(34例患者)和触诊组(35例患者)。记录每组从皮肤穿刺到成功插入动脉导管的时间、每次插入尝试所用时间、所需尝试次数以及使用的套管数量。使用超声技术时,21例(62%)患者首次尝试即成功插入动脉套管,而触诊组为12例(34%)(p = 0.03)。与触诊相比,使用超声进行导管插入所需的尝试次数明显更少(均值±标准差,1.6±1.0 对 3.1±2.4;p = 0.003);然而,每次成功尝试所用时间更长(26.1±2.0 对 17.3±1.6秒,p = 0.001)。超声组导管插入所需的总时间有缩短趋势(55.5±63.8 对 111.5±121.5秒,p = 0.17)。超声组有4例失败,触诊组有1例失败(无显著差异)。
超声是动脉导管插入术的有用辅助手段,可提高首次尝试的成功率。该技术易于学习,可能会减少导管插入所需时间。