Omary Reed A, Green Jordin D, Fang Wayne S, Viohl Ingmar, Finn J Paul, Li Debiao
Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, 676 North St. Clair, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Feb;14(2 Pt 1):247-54. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000058328.82956.15.
To test the hypotheses that a single internal guide wire coil (i) permits independent and direct depiction of guide wires and catheters and (ii) improves catheter-tracking accuracy and depiction compared to external receiver coils.
Standard 5-6-F angiographic catheters were filled with dilute 4% gadolinium chelate. A single 0.030-inch-diameter internal guide wire coil was placed inside the catheter. True fast imaging with steady-state precession was used to directly visualize the guide wire. Inversion recovery-prepared fast low-angle shot technique was used to track catheters over a thick slice. In phantom experiments, we compared catheter signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) with the internal coil and a phased-array surface coil with use of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Tip-tracking accuracy was assessed with use of linear regression. In pigs (n = 7), catheters and guide wires were independently tracked in real time.
In phantoms, catheter SNR with the internal coil (12.0) was significantly greater than that with the surface coil (4.0; P =.001). Tip-tracking accuracy was also improved with use of the internal coil (R(2) = 0.94 vs 0.50). In swine vasculature, catheters and guide wires could be directly and independently tracked at 1.7-2.0 frames per second. Catheters were clearly visualized with use of the internal coil, with a typical catheter background contrast-to-noise ratio of 6.6. Catheters were not visible with use of the external coil because of the small catheter size compared to the slice thickness.
Internal guide wire coils permit independent and direct depiction of guide wires and catheters in vivo for MR imaging-guided endovascular interventions. They also improve catheter tracking accuracy and depiction compared to external coils.
验证以下假设:(i)单个内部导丝线圈能够独立且直接地显示导丝和导管;(ii)与外部接收线圈相比,其能提高导管追踪的准确性及显示效果。
将标准的5-6F血管造影导管充满稀释的4%钆螯合物。在导管内放置一根直径0.030英寸的单个内部导丝线圈。采用稳态进动快速成像直接观察导丝。利用反转恢复准备的快速低角度激发技术在厚层上追踪导管。在模型实验中,我们使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了内部线圈和相控阵表面线圈的导管信噪比(SNR)。通过线性回归评估尖端追踪的准确性。在猪(n = 7)身上,实时独立追踪导管和导丝。
在模型中,内部线圈的导管SNR(12.0)显著高于表面线圈(4.0;P = 0.001)。使用内部线圈时,尖端追踪准确性也有所提高(R² = 0.94对比0.50)。在猪的血管系统中,导管和导丝能够以每秒1.7 - 2.0帧的速度被直接且独立地追踪。使用内部线圈能清晰显示导管,典型的导管背景对比噪声比为6.6。由于导管尺寸相对于层厚较小,使用外部线圈时无法看到导管。
内部导丝线圈可在体内对导丝和导管进行独立且直接的显示,用于磁共振成像引导的血管内介入治疗。与外部线圈相比,它们还能提高导管追踪的准确性及显示效果。