Cormio G, Di Fazio F, Lorusso F, Di Gesù G, Cacciapuoti C, Loverro G, Nappi L, Selvaggi L
Sezione di Ginecologia A, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche Generali e Specialistiche, Università degli Studi di Bari, Italy.
J Chemother. 2002 Dec;14(6):618-22. doi: 10.1179/joc.2002.14.6.618.
A prospective randomized study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari to compare two antimicrobial regimens, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin as ultra-short term prophylaxis in laparotomic gynecologic surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive a single dose of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (2.2 g) [Group A] or cefazolin (2 g) [Group B] 30 minutes before surgery. Each patient was assessed daily until discharge for fever and the presence of infection of the surgical wound, urinary tract and respiratory tract. In the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Group A) and cefazolin (Group B) groups, overall 258 and 253 patients, respectively were evaluable for prophylactic efficacy at hospital discharge. Infectious complications were infrequent in both arms. Febrile morbidity occurred in 16 (6.3%) and 21 (8.1%) patients respectively in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazolin groups. Wound infection and urinary tract infection were also higher but not significantly in the cefazolin group (0.8% versus 0% and 2.7% versus 2.0% respectively). There was no respiratory tract infection or septic death in either group. It is concluded that ultra-short term prophylaxis with both amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazolin is safe and effective in elective laparotomic gynecologic surgery.
巴里大学妇产科进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较两种抗菌方案,即阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢唑林作为剖腹妇科手术的超短期预防用药。患者被随机分配在手术前30分钟接受单剂量的阿莫西林-克拉维酸(2.2克)[A组]或头孢唑林(2克)[B组]。对每位患者每天进行评估,直至出院,评估指标包括发热情况以及手术伤口、泌尿道和呼吸道是否存在感染。在阿莫西林-克拉维酸组(A组)和头孢唑林组(B组)中,分别有258例和253例患者在出院时可评估预防效果。两组的感染并发症均不常见。阿莫西林-克拉维酸组和头孢唑林组分别有16例(6.3%)和21例(8.1%)患者出现发热性疾病。头孢唑林组的伤口感染和泌尿道感染也较高,但无显著差异(分别为0.8%对0%和2.7%对2.0%)。两组均未发生呼吸道感染或败血症死亡。结论是,阿莫西林-克拉维酸和头孢唑林的超短期预防在择期剖腹妇科手术中是安全有效的。