• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴道妇科手术中的抗菌预防:一项比较阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢唑林的前瞻性随机研究。

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in vaginal gynecologic surgery: a prospective randomized study comparing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin.

作者信息

Cormio G, Vicino M, Loizzi V, Tangari D, Selvaggi L

机构信息

Sezione de Ginecologia A, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche Generali e Specialistische, Università degli studi di Bari, Bari, Italy. n.cormio@

出版信息

J Chemother. 2007 Apr;19(2):193-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.2.193.

DOI:10.1179/joc.2007.19.2.193
PMID:17434829
Abstract

The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin as ultra-short term prophylaxis in vaginal gynecologic surgery. It was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari. Patients were randomly allocated to receive amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (2.2 g) [Group A] or cefazolin (2 g) [Group B] as a single dose 30 minutes before surgery. Each patient was assessed daily until discharge to evidence febrile status and the presence of infections at the operative site, urinary tract and respiratory tract. In the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Group A) and cefazolin (Group B) groups, overall 88 and 90 patients, respectively, were evaluable for prophylactic efficacy at hospital discharge. Infectious complications were infrequent in both arms, with febrile morbidity occurring in 4 (4.5%) and 16 (8.9%) patients respectively in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazolin groups (p=0.016). Urinary tract infections were higher but not significantly in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group (6.8% versus 4.4 %), whereas asymptomatic bacteriuria was detected in 2.2% of the patients in both groups. There was no respiratory tract infection or septic death in either group. It is concluded that ultra-short term prophylaxis with both amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefazolin is safe and effective in elective vaginal gynecologic surgery.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是比较阿莫西林克拉维酸与头孢唑林在阴道妇科手术中作为超短期预防用药的效果。该研究在巴里大学妇产科进行。患者被随机分配接受阿莫西林克拉维酸(2.2克)[A组]或头孢唑林(2克)[B组],于手术前30分钟单次给药。对每位患者每日进行评估,直至出院,以明确发热状况以及手术部位、泌尿道和呼吸道是否存在感染。在阿莫西林克拉维酸组(A组)和头孢唑林组(B组)中,分别有88例和90例患者在出院时可评估预防效果。两组的感染并发症均较少见,阿莫西林克拉维酸组和头孢唑林组分别有4例(4.5%)和16例(8.9%)患者出现发热性疾病(p = 0.016)。阿莫西林克拉维酸组的尿路感染发生率较高,但无显著差异(6.8%对4.4%),而两组均有2.2%的患者检测到无症状菌尿。两组均未发生呼吸道感染或败血症死亡。结论是,在择期阴道妇科手术中,阿莫西林克拉维酸和头孢唑林进行超短期预防均安全有效。

相似文献

1
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in vaginal gynecologic surgery: a prospective randomized study comparing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin.阴道妇科手术中的抗菌预防:一项比较阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢唑林的前瞻性随机研究。
J Chemother. 2007 Apr;19(2):193-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.2.193.
2
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparotomic gynecologic surgery: a prospective randomized study comparing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin.开腹妇科手术中的抗菌预防:一项比较阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸与头孢唑林的前瞻性随机研究。
J Chemother. 2002 Dec;14(6):618-22. doi: 10.1179/joc.2002.14.6.618.
3
[A randomized study comparing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin as antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparotomic gynecologic surgery].一项比较阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢唑林在开腹妇科手术中作为抗菌预防用药的随机研究
Minerva Ginecol. 2006 Apr;58(2):85-90.
4
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a prospective randomized study comparing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin.腹腔镜妇科手术中的抗菌预防:一项比较阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢唑林的前瞻性随机研究。
J Chemother. 2003 Dec;15(6):574-8. doi: 10.1179/joc.2003.15.6.574.
5
Prospective randomized study comparing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid with cefazolin as antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparotomic gynecologic surgery.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较阿莫西林-克拉维酸与头孢唑林在开腹妇科手术中作为抗菌预防用药的效果。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Dec;82(12):1130-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0412.2003.00236.x.
6
Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncological surgery.清洁-污染的头颈肿瘤手术中的抗生素预防
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;35(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
7
Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.择期剖宫产手术前与脐带结扎后使用抗生素预防感染:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验
Arch Surg. 2011 Dec;146(12):1404-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.725.
8
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid versus cefotaxime for antimicrobial prophylaxis in abdominal surgery: a randomized trial.阿莫西林/克拉维酸与头孢噻肟用于腹部手术抗菌预防的随机对照试验
J Chemother. 2002 Aug;14(4):366-72. doi: 10.1179/joc.2002.14.4.366.
9
Comparison of ceftibuten vs. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as antibiotic prophylaxis in cholecystectomy and/or biliary tract surgery.头孢布烯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸在胆囊切除术和/或胆道手术中作为抗生素预防性用药的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Nov-Dec;4(6):606-10. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80109-2.
10
Usage of prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated gynecologic abdominal surgery in Siriraj hospital.诗里拉吉医院单纯性妇科腹部手术中预防性抗生素的使用情况
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Jun;90(6):1068-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic prophylaxis in gynaecologic procedures.妇科手术中的抗生素预防
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Apr;34(4):382-391. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35222-7.
2
Increased incidence of postoperative infections during prophylaxis with cephalothin compared to doxycycline in intestinal surgery.在肠道手术中,与强力霉素相比,头孢噻吩预防期间术后感染的发生率增加。
BMC Surg. 2009 Dec 7;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-9-17.
3
Urinary tract infections after pelvic floor gynecological surgery: prevalence and effect of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A systematic review.
盆底妇科手术后的尿路感染:抗菌药物预防的患病率及效果。一项系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1165-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0584-0. Epub 2008 Apr 10.