Coppieters Michel W, Stappaerts Karel H, Wouters Leo L, Janssens Koen
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, University of Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Feb;26(2):99-106. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2003.16.
Observation of the occurrence of protective muscle activity is advocated in assessment of the peripheral nervous system by means of neural provocation tests. However, no studies have yet demonstrated abnormal force generation in a patient population.
To analyze whether aberrations in shoulder girdle-elevation force during neural tissue provocation testing for the median nerve (NTPT1) can be demonstrated, and whether possible aberrations can be normalized following cervical mobilization.
A single-blind randomized comparative controlled study.
Laboratory setting annex in a manual therapy teaching practice.
Twenty patients with unilateral or bilateral neurogenic cervicobrachial pain.
During the NTPT1, we used a load cell and electrogoniometer to record continuously the shoulder-girdle elevation force in relation to the available range of elbow extension. Following randomization, we analyzed the immediate treatment effects of a cervical contralateral lateral glide mobilization technique (experimental group) and therapeutic ultrasound (control group).
On the involved side, the shoulder-girdle elevation force occurred earlier, and the amount of force at the end of the test was substantially, though not significantly, greater than that on the uninvolved side at the corresponding range of motion. Together with a significant reduction in pain perception after cervical mobilization, a clear tendency toward normalization of the force curve could be observed, namely, a significant decrease in force generation and a delayed onset. The control group demonstrated no differences.
Aberrations in force generation during neural provocation testing are present in patients with neurogenic pain and can be normalized with appropriate treatment modalities.
在通过神经激发试验评估周围神经系统时,提倡观察保护性肌肉活动的发生情况。然而,尚无研究在患者群体中证实存在异常的力量产生。
分析在正中神经神经组织激发试验(NTPT1)期间,肩带抬高力量是否存在异常,以及颈椎松动后可能的异常是否可以恢复正常。
单盲随机对照比较研究。
手法治疗教学实践中的实验室附属设置。
20名单侧或双侧神经源性颈臂痛患者。
在NTPT1期间,我们使用测力传感器和电子角度计连续记录与肘关节伸展可用范围相关的肩带抬高力量。随机分组后,我们分析了颈椎对侧侧方滑动松动技术(实验组)和治疗性超声(对照组)的即时治疗效果。
在患侧,肩带抬高力量出现得更早,并且在相应运动范围内,试验结束时的力量大小虽未显著大于健侧,但明显更大。随着颈椎松动后疼痛感知的显著降低,可以观察到力量曲线有明显的恢复正常趋势,即力量产生显著减少且起始延迟。对照组未显示出差异。
神经源性疼痛患者在神经激发试验期间存在力量产生异常,且可通过适当的治疗方式恢复正常。