Caponi Sandra
Departamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) SC Brasil.
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2002 Sep-Dec;9(3):591-608. doi: 10.1590/s0104-59702002000300006.
This paper analyzes the answer given by Pasteur to those who defended the spontaneous generation theory and evaluates the impact these arguments had on the history of public hygiene. Because of that, the article emphasizes transmission of germs, rather than the origin of life, which has been quite analyzed. It also discusses the criticism Pasteur made to naturalists' arguments and tries to show that it is possible to say there is a certain continuity between the air-related concerns on the part of classic hygienists, most of which infectionists, and Pasteur's concern with germs spread in the air.
本文分析了巴斯德对那些捍卫自然发生说的人所给出的回答,并评估了这些论点对公共卫生史的影响。因此,本文强调病菌的传播,而非生命的起源,后者已得到了充分分析。本文还讨论了巴斯德对博物学家论点的批判,并试图表明,经典卫生学家(其中大多数是感染源论者)对空气相关问题的关注与巴斯德对空气中病菌传播的关注之间存在一定的连续性,这是有可能成立的。