• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电休克治疗与重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度难治性非精神病性重度抑郁症的随机对照比较

A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression.

作者信息

Grunhaus Leon, Schreiber Shaul, Dolberg Ornah T, Polak Dana, Dannon Pinhas N

机构信息

Psychiatry Division and the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory at Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Feb 15;53(4):324-31. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01499-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01499-3
PMID:12586451
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies published over the past few years suggest that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may have significant antidepressant actions. In a previous report, we compared electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive TMS (rTMS) and found ECT to be superior for psychotic major depression (MD); however, ECT and rTMS had similar results in nonpsychotic MD. We now report on a controlled randomized comparison of ECT and rTMS in patients with nonpsychotic MD.

METHODS

Forty patients with nonpsychotic MD referred for ECT were included. Electroconvulsive therapy was performed according to established protocols. Repetitive TMS was performed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 90% motor threshold. Patients were treated with 20 sessions (five times per week for 4 weeks) of 10-Hz treatments (1200 pulses per treatment-day) at 90% motor threshold. Response to treatment was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score, with a final HRSD equal or less than 10 points and a final Global Assessment of Function Scale rating of 60 or more points.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 58% (23 out of 40 patients responded to treatment). In the ECT group, 12 responded and eight did not; in the rTMS group, 11 responded and nine did not (chi2 =.10, ns). Thus, patients responded as well to either ECT or rTMS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to the growing literature supporting an antidepressant effect for rTMS. This study is particularly relevant because it suggests that rTMS and ECT reach similar results in nonpsychotic major depressive disorder.

摘要

背景

过去几年发表的研究表明,经颅磁刺激(TMS)可能具有显著的抗抑郁作用。在之前的一份报告中,我们比较了电休克疗法(ECT)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),发现ECT对伴有精神病性症状的重度抑郁症(MD)疗效更佳;然而,ECT和rTMS在非精神病性MD患者中的疗效相似。我们现在报告一项针对非精神病性MD患者的ECT与rTMS的对照随机比较研究。

方法

纳入40例因ECT前来就诊的非精神病性MD患者。电休克疗法按照既定方案进行。重复经颅磁刺激在左侧背外侧前额叶皮质以90%运动阈值进行。患者接受20次治疗(每周5次,共4周),采用10赫兹刺激(每次治疗日1200个脉冲),刺激强度为90%运动阈值。治疗反应定义为汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)评分至少降低50%,最终HRSD评分等于或低于10分,最终功能总体评定量表评分为60分或更高。

结果

总体反应率为58%(40例患者中有23例对治疗有反应)。在ECT组中,12例有反应,8例无反应;在rTMS组中,11例有反应,9例无反应(χ² = 0.10,无统计学意义)。因此,患者对ECT或rTMS的反应相同。

结论

本研究进一步支持了rTMS具有抗抑郁作用的文献。本研究尤为重要,因为它表明rTMS和ECT在非精神病性重度抑郁症中疗效相似。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression.电休克治疗与重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度难治性非精神病性重度抑郁症的随机对照比较
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Feb 15;53(4):324-31. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01499-3.
2
The clinical effectiveness and cost of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy in severe depression: a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic analysis.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效及成本:一项多中心实用随机对照试验及经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(24):1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta11240.
3
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is as effective as electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of nondelusional major depressive disorder: an open study.重复经颅磁刺激治疗非妄想性重度抑郁症的疗效与电休克治疗相当:一项开放性研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb 15;47(4):314-24. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00254-1.
4
Three and six-month outcome following courses of either ECT or rTMS in a population of severely depressed individuals--preliminary report.严重抑郁个体群体中接受ECT或rTMS治疗疗程后的3个月和6个月结果——初步报告
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Apr 15;51(8):687-90. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01274-4.
5
A randomized, controlled trial with 6-month follow-up of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression.一项针对重度抑郁症的重复经颅磁刺激和电休克治疗的随机对照试验,随访6个月。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;164(1):73-81. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.73.
6
Transcranial magnetic stimulation accelerates the antidepressant effect of amitriptyline in severe depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.经颅磁刺激可加速阿米替林对重度抑郁症的抗抑郁作用:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 15;57(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.029.
7
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a meta-analysis of stimulus parameter effects.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症:刺激参数效应的荟萃分析
Neurol Res. 2013 Dec;35(10):1084-91. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000245. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
8
Remission rate of transcranial magnetic stimulation compared with electroconvulsive therapy: a case-control study.经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗的缓解率比较:一项病例对照研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;72(7):471-476. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1481998. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: preliminary results of a randomized trial.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机试验的初步结果
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Apr 15;51(8):659-67. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01354-3.
10
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(5):1-66. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of patients receiving interventional psychiatric procedures in a large integrated healthcare system.在一个大型综合医疗保健系统中接受介入性精神科治疗的患者的治疗结果。
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Sep;351:116647. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116647. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
2
A New Trick of Old Dogs: Can Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist Properties of Antidepressants Assist in Treating Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD)?老药新用:抗抑郁药的κ阿片受体拮抗剂特性能否助力治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)?
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Feb 3;18(2):208. doi: 10.3390/ph18020208.
3
More rTMS pulses or more sessions? The impact on treatment outcome for treatment resistant depression.
更多的重复经颅磁刺激脉冲还是更多的疗程?对难治性抑郁症治疗结果的影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Apr;151(4):485-505. doi: 10.1111/acps.13768. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
Effects of routine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the sleep duration of patients with treatment-resistant depression: A prospective cohort study.常规重复经颅磁刺激对难治性抑郁症患者睡眠时间的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PCN Rep. 2024 Apr 1;3(2):e187. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.187. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With and Without Text4Support for the Treatment of Resistant Depression: Protocol for a Patient-Centered Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.重复经颅磁刺激联合或不联合Text4Support治疗难治性抑郁症:一项以患者为中心的多中心随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Dec 7;12:e46830. doi: 10.2196/46830.
6
Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on sleep quality and mood in patients with major depressive disorder.经颅磁刺激对重性抑郁障碍患者睡眠质量和情绪的影响。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 May 1;18(5):1297-1305. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9846.
7
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for People With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 May 6;21(4):1-232. eCollection 2021.
8
Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Different Parameters: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.不同参数重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机双盲对照试验
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 6;12:623765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.623765. eCollection 2021.
9
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.重复经颅磁刺激作为一种治疗大麻使用障碍的潜在方法。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;109:110290. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110290. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.中线 TMS 中脑外解剖结构和线圈方向对受试者内和受试者间变异性的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Sep;129(9):1873-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.749. Epub 2018 Jul 6.