Borenstein Jeff E, Graber Geneen, Saltiel Emmanuel, Wallace Joel, Ryu Seonyoung, Archi Jackson, Deutsch Stephen, Weingarten Scott R
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Beverly Hills, California 90212, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Feb;23(2):209-16. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.2.209.32096.
To compare the effectiveness of an evidence-based, systematic approach to hypertension care involving comanagement of patients by primary care physicians and clinical pharmacists versus usual care in reducing blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Patients in a staff model medical group with uncontrolled hypertension were randomized to either a usual care (UC) or a physician-pharmacist comanagement (PPCM) group. All physicians in the study received both group and individual education and participated in the development of an evidence-based hypertension treatment algorithm. Physicians were then given the names of their patients whose medical records documented elevated blood pressures (defined as systolic > or = 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic > or = 90 mm Hg for patients aged < 65 yrs, and systolic > or = 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic > or = 90 mm Hg for those aged > or = 65 yrs). Patients randomized to the UC group were managed by primary care physicians alone. Those randomized to the PPCM group were comanaged by their primary care physician and a clinical pharmacist, who provided patient education, made treatment recommendations, and provided follow-up. Blood pressure measurements, antihypertensive drugs, and visit costs/patient were obtained from medical records.
One hundred ninety-seven patients with uncontrolled hypertension participated in the study. Both PPCM and UC groups experienced significant reductions in blood pressure (systolic -22 and -11 mm Hg, respectively, p < 0.01; diastolic -7 and -8 mm Hg, respectively, p < 0.01). The reduction in systolic blood pressure was greater in the PPCM group after adjusting for differences in baseline blood pressure between the groups (p < 0.01). More patients achieved blood pressure control in the PPCM than in the UC group (60% vs 43%, p = 0.02). Average provider visit costs/patient were higher in the UC than the PPCM group ($195 vs $160, p = 0.02).
An evidence-based, systematic approach using physician-pharmacist comanagement for patients with uncontrolled hypertension resulted in improved blood pressure control and reduced average visit costs/patient.
比较由初级保健医生和临床药剂师共同管理患者的循证、系统高血压护理方法与常规护理在降低未控制高血压患者血压方面的有效性。
在一个员工模式医疗集团中,将未控制高血压患者随机分为常规护理(UC)组或医生 - 药剂师共同管理(PPCM)组。研究中的所有医生都接受了小组和个人教育,并参与了循证高血压治疗算法的制定。然后,医生们得到了其病历记录显示血压升高(对于年龄小于65岁的患者,定义为收缩压≥140毫米汞柱和/或舒张压≥90毫米汞柱;对于年龄≥65岁的患者,定义为收缩压≥160毫米汞柱和/或舒张压≥90毫米汞柱)的患者名单。随机分配到UC组的患者仅由初级保健医生管理。随机分配到PPCM组的患者由其初级保健医生和临床药剂师共同管理,临床药剂师提供患者教育、提出治疗建议并进行随访。从病历中获取血压测量值、降压药物以及每位患者的就诊费用。
197例未控制高血压患者参与了该研究。PPCM组和UC组的血压均显著降低(收缩压分别降低22和11毫米汞柱,p < 0.01;舒张压分别降低7和8毫米汞柱,p < 0.01)。在调整两组基线血压差异后,PPCM组的收缩压降低幅度更大(p < 0.01)。与UC组相比,PPCM组有更多患者实现了血压控制(60%对43%,p = 0.02)。UC组每位患者的平均就诊费用高于PPCM组(195美元对160美元,p = 0.02)。
对于未控制高血压患者,采用医生 - 药剂师共同管理的循证、系统方法可改善血压控制并降低每位患者的平均就诊费用。