Radke P W, Kaiser A, Frost C, Sigwart U
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK.
Eur Heart J. 2003 Feb;24(3):266-73. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00202-6.
To evaluate the clinical outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.
For identification of the relevant literature a specific search strategy was conducted and explicit inclusion criteria were defined to avoid selection bias. Based on the selected literature, a systematic review using descriptive statistics and meta-analysis methods regarding the outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis was performed. The proportion of patients experiencing a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) as defined by death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization was the main outcome measure. A total of 1304 citations were identified. Among these, 28 studies (six different treatment modalities) including a total of 3012 patients met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into this analysis. The estimated average probability of experiencing a major cardiac adverse event after treatment for in-stent restenosis with a follow-up period of 9+/-4 months was 30.0% (25.0-34.9%, 95% confidence interval) with strong evidence for heterogeneity between study specific results (P=0.0001). The clinical outcome was not significantly different between treatment modalities. After adjustment for confounding factors (i.e. lesion length), however, patients undergoing intracoronary radiation showed an estimated advantage of 16.9% (-37.7+/-4.0%, 95% confidence interval) in MACE free survival, as compared to balloon angioplasty. The post-interventional diameter stenosis was the only independent predictor for the long-term outcome after treatment of in-stent restenosis.
Treatment of in-stent restenosis is associated with an overall 30% rate of major adverse cardiac events. Currently, repeat angioplasty is the treatment option of choice, especially when a sufficient acute procedural result can be achieved. Intracoronary radiation should be considered in cases with therapy refractory forms of diffuse in-stent restenosis.
评估冠状动脉支架内再狭窄治疗后的临床结局。
为了识别相关文献,实施了特定的检索策略,并定义了明确的纳入标准以避免选择偏倚。基于所选文献,采用描述性统计和荟萃分析方法对冠状动脉支架内再狭窄治疗后的结局进行了系统评价。主要结局指标为发生由死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建所定义的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的患者比例。共识别出1304篇文献。其中,28项研究(六种不同治疗方式)共纳入3012例患者,符合纳入标准并纳入本分析。随访9±4个月,支架内再狭窄治疗后发生主要心脏不良事件的估计平均概率为30.0%(25.0 - 34.9%,95%置信区间),各研究具体结果之间存在显著异质性(P = 0.0001)。不同治疗方式之间的临床结局无显著差异。然而,在对混杂因素(即病变长度)进行校正后,与球囊血管成形术相比,接受冠状动脉内放射治疗的患者在无MACE生存方面显示出16.9%(-37.7±4.0%,95%置信区间)的估计优势。介入治疗后的直径狭窄是支架内再狭窄治疗后长期结局的唯一独立预测因素。
支架内再狭窄治疗后主要不良心脏事件的总体发生率为30%。目前,重复血管成形术是首选的治疗方案,尤其是在能够获得足够的急性手术效果时。对于弥漫性支架内再狭窄的难治性治疗形式,应考虑冠状动脉内放射治疗。