不同深静脉血栓临床概率患者的D-二聚体、其他止血激活标志物及可溶性黏附分子

D-dimer, other markers of haemostasis activation and soluble adhesion molecules in patients with different clinical probabilities of deep vein thrombosis.

作者信息

Bozic Mojca, Blinc Ales, Stegnar Mojca

机构信息

Department of Angiology, University Medical Centre, Riharjeva 24, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2002 Nov 1;108(2-3):107-14. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00007-0.

Abstract

Two automated turbidimetric D-dimer assays (BC D-dimer Plus, Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany and Auto-Dimer, Biopool, Umeå, Sweden) were compared to two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (Enzygnost D-dimer micro, Dade Behring and Asserachrome D-dimer, Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France) and two rapid D-dimer assays (SimpliRed, Agen Biomedical, Brisbane, Australia and Minutex, Biopool) in out-patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In addition, the performance of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), and soluble adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and P-selectin for DVT diagnosis was assessed. One hundred and thirty-five consecutive out-patients with suspected DVT of the lower limb were included, and in 52 (39%), DVT was confirmed by compression ultrasound. All D-dimer assays investigated reliably excluded DVT in those patients without DVT irrespective of their pre-test clinical probability of DVT. One D-dimer ELISA (Dade Behring) gave the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve compared to other assays, and therefore, this was the most accurate assay in differentiating patients with from patients without DVT. The diagnostic performance of one automated turbidimetric assay (Auto Dimer, Biopool) was similar to ELISA and its convenience close to rapid latex agglutination assays. Most patients with a high pre-test clinical probability of DVT had positive D-dimer regardless of the presence or absence of DVT, which decreased the specificity of the tests and made D-dimer determination less useful for this group of patients. Because the diagnostic accuracy [sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV)] of F1+2, TAT, VCAM-1 and P-selectin was inferior to D-dimer assay, these assays could not substitute or supplement D-dimer testing in diagnosis of DVT. Levels of VCAM-1 and P-selectin were increased in patients with DVT and should therefore be investigated further to clarify their role in DVT.

摘要

在疑似深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的门诊患者中,对两种自动化比浊法D - 二聚体检测(BC D - dimer Plus,德国马尔堡的达德拜林公司;Auto - Dimer,瑞典于默奥的生物池公司)与两种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(Enzygnost D - dimer micro,达德拜林公司;Asserachrome D - dimer,法国阿斯尼埃的诊断斯塔戈公司)以及两种快速D - 二聚体检测(SimpliRed,澳大利亚布里斯班的阿金生物医学公司;Minutex,生物池公司)进行了比较。此外,还评估了凝血酶原片段1 + 2(F1 + 2)、凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶复合物(TAT)以及可溶性黏附分子VCAM - 1和P - 选择素对DVT诊断的性能。纳入了135例连续的疑似下肢DVT的门诊患者,其中52例(39%)经压迫超声证实为DVT。所有研究的D - 二聚体检测方法均能可靠地排除无DVT患者的DVT,无论其DVT的检测前临床概率如何。与其他检测方法相比,一种D - 二聚体ELISA(达德拜林公司)在受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积最大,因此,在区分有DVT和无DVT患者方面是最准确的检测方法。一种自动化比浊法检测(Auto Dimer,生物池公司)的诊断性能与ELISA相似,其便利性接近快速乳胶凝集试验。大多数检测前临床概率高的DVT患者,无论是否存在DVT,D - 二聚体均为阳性,这降低了检测的特异性,使D - 二聚体测定对这组患者的用处减小。由于F1 + 2、TAT、VCAM - 1和P - 选择素的诊断准确性[敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)]低于D - 二聚体检测,这些检测方法不能替代或补充D - 二聚体检测用于DVT的诊断。DVT患者的VCAM - 1和P - 选择素水平升高,因此应进一步研究以阐明它们在DVT中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索