Lamas C C, Eykyn S J
Department of Infection, North Wing, 5th floor, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):258-62. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.258.
To analyse cases of blood culture negative endocarditis (BCNE) seen at St Thomas' Hospital, London, between 1975 and 2000.
Data on all episodes of endocarditis with negative blood cultures seen at St Thomas' Hospital between 1975 and 2000 were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively.
Sixty three patients with BCNE were seen during the study period: 48 (76%) with native and 15 (24%) prosthetic valve infection. BCNE accounted for 12.2% of the 516 cases of endocarditis seen at St Thomas' Hospital. The diagnosis of endocarditis was clinically definite by the Duke criteria in only 21% (7 of 34) of cases of pathologically proven native valve endocarditis but in 62% (21 of 34) of cases by the St Thomas' modifications of the criteria. Comparable figures for the 11 cases of pathologically proven prosthetic valve endocarditis were 45% and 73%. Despite negative blood cultures a causative organism was identified in 31 (49%) of the 63 cases: in 15 by serology (8 Coxiella burnetii, 6 Bartonella species, and 1 Chlamydia psittaci); in 9 cases by culture of the excised valve; in 3 by microscopy of the excised valve, on which large numbers of Gram positive cocci were seen although the culture was sterile; and in the other 4 by isolation from a site other than the excised valve (2 respiratory specimens, 1 from the pacemaker tip, and 1 from an excised embolus). In addition 5 of the 6 cases of Bartonella infection were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction study of the excised valve. Two thirds of the 32 patients for whom no pathogen was identified had received antibiotics before blood was cultured. Thus truly "negative" endocarditis was very uncommon (6% of the cases).
If blood cultures are negative in definite or suspected endocarditis, serum should be analysed for Bartonella, Coxiella, and Chlamydia species antibodies, and the excised valve or (rarely) embolus should be analysed by microscopy, culture, histology, and relevant polymerase chain reaction. Other specimens may be relevant. The Duke criteria performed poorly in BCNE; St Thomas' additional minor criteria gave more definite diagnoses.
分析1975年至2000年间在伦敦圣托马斯医院所见的血培养阴性的心内膜炎(BCNE)病例。
前瞻性收集1975年至2000年间在圣托马斯医院所见的所有血培养阴性的心内膜炎发作的数据,并进行回顾性分析。
在研究期间共见到63例BCNE患者:48例(76%)为天然瓣膜感染,15例(24%)为人工瓣膜感染。BCNE占圣托马斯医院所见516例心内膜炎病例的12.2%。在心内膜炎的诊断中,根据杜克标准,经病理证实的天然瓣膜心内膜炎病例中只有21%(34例中的7例)临床诊断明确,但根据圣托马斯医院对该标准的修订,这一比例为62%(34例中的21例)。11例经病理证实的人工瓣膜心内膜炎病例的相应数字分别为45%和73%。尽管血培养阴性,但在63例病例中有31例(49%)确定了致病微生物:15例通过血清学检测(8例为伯氏考克斯体,6例为巴尔通体属,1例为鹦鹉热衣原体);9例通过切除瓣膜的培养;3例通过切除瓣膜的显微镜检查,尽管培养无菌,但在瓣膜上可见大量革兰氏阳性球菌;另外4例通过从切除瓣膜以外的部位分离得到(2例呼吸道标本,1例来自起搏器尖端,1例来自切除的栓子)。此外,6例巴尔通体感染病例中有5例通过对切除瓣膜的聚合酶链反应研究得到证实。在未鉴定出病原体的32例患者中,三分之二在血培养前接受过抗生素治疗。因此,真正“阴性”的心内膜炎非常罕见(占病例的6%)。
如果在明确或疑似的心内膜炎中血培养阴性,应分析血清中的巴尔通体、考克斯体和衣原体属抗体,并通过显微镜检查、培养、组织学检查和相关聚合酶链反应对切除的瓣膜或(很少)栓子进行分析。其他标本也可能有意义。杜克标准在BCNE中表现不佳;圣托马斯医院的附加次要标准能做出更明确的诊断。