Bateman G A
Department of Medical Imaging, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Newcastle Region Mail Centre, 2310 Australia.
Neuroradiology. 2003 Feb;45(2):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s00234-002-0901-0. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
Superficial cortical venous compression secondary to alterations in craniospinal compliance is implicated in the pathogenesis of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). A reduction in the pulsation in the outflow of the cortical veins would be expected to occur following compression of these veins and this has been shown in NPH. If cortical vein compression is a causative factor in NPH, it would be expected that cortical vein compliance as measured by pulsatility would be significantly altered by a curative procedure i.e. shunt tube insertion. My purpose is to compare the blood flow pulsatility characteristics in a group of patients with NPH before and after shunt tube insertion. I initially studied 18 subjects without pathology with MRI flow quantification studies of the cerebral arteries and veins to define the range of normality. The main study involved 18 patients with idiopathic dementia and mild leukoaraiosis who served as controls and seven patients with NPH studied before and after shunt insertion. Arterial, superior sagittal and straight sinus pulsatility was not significantly different between the patients with idiopathic dementia and those NPH patients before or after shunting. Cortical vein pulsatility before shunting in the patients with NPH was 43% lower than in those with idiopathic dementia ( P=0.006). Following shunting, cortical vein pulsatility increased by 186% ( P=0.007). There is thus reduced compliance in cortical veins in NPH which is significantly increased in patients who respond to insertion of a shunt tube. These findings suggest that reversible elevation in cortical vein pressure and reversal of the normal absorption pathway for cerebrospinal fluid may be behind the pathophysiology of NPH.
颅脊髓顺应性改变继发的浅表皮质静脉受压与正常压力脑积水(NPH)的发病机制有关。这些静脉受压后,预计皮质静脉流出的搏动会减少,这在NPH中已得到证实。如果皮质静脉受压是NPH的致病因素,那么通过搏动性测量的皮质静脉顺应性预计会因治疗性手术(即插入分流管)而发生显著改变。我的目的是比较一组NPH患者在插入分流管前后的血流搏动特征。我最初对18名无病变的受试者进行了脑动脉和静脉的MRI血流定量研究,以确定正常范围。主要研究包括18名患有特发性痴呆和轻度脑白质疏松症的患者作为对照组,以及7名在分流管插入前后进行研究的NPH患者。特发性痴呆患者与NPH患者在分流前后的动脉、上矢状窦和直窦搏动性无显著差异。NPH患者分流前的皮质静脉搏动性比特发性痴呆患者低43%(P=0.006)。分流后,皮质静脉搏动性增加了186%(P=0.007)。因此,NPH患者的皮质静脉顺应性降低,而对插入分流管有反应的患者皮质静脉顺应性显著增加。这些发现表明,皮质静脉压力的可逆性升高和脑脊液正常吸收途径的逆转可能是NPH病理生理学的背后原因。