Suppr超能文献

高剂量丙酸倍氯米松雾化混悬液与丙酸倍氯米松定量气雾剂用于中度至重度哮喘依赖激素成人的疗效及安全性比较

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of high doses of beclometasone dipropionate suspension for nebulization and beclometasone dipropionate via a metered-dose inhaler in steroid-dependent adults with moderate to severe asthma.

作者信息

Grzelewska-Rzymowska I, Kroczynska-Bednarek J, Zarkovic J

机构信息

Institute of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of TBC.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2003 Feb;97 Suppl B:S21-6. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(03)90074-6.

Abstract

Nebulization for the administration of high doses of inhaled corticosteroids can benefit steroid-dependent asthmatics. The objective of this double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose corticosteroids given by nebulization or metered-dose inhalation in adult patients with asthma. Following a 2-week run-in period, 124 patients, aged 18-70 years, with moderate to severe asthma treated with high-dose inhaled steroids were randomized to one of two treatment groups for 12 weeks: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) suspension for nebulization 3,000-4,000 microgday(-1) b.i.d. given via a nebulizer (n = 63), or BDP spray 1,500-2000 microgday(-1) b.i.d. given via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer (BDP MDI) (n = 61). Comparable improvements over baseline, which were statistically significant in most cases, were reported at study end for the two treatment groups in the various efficacy parameters evaluated (pulmonary function tests, clinical symptoms scores, and the use of rescue salbutamol). The primary efficacy endpoint was morning pulmonary expiratory flow rate (PEFR). For the intent-to-treat population, in the BDP nebulization group mean morning PEFR increased statistically significantly from 308.7 +/- 107.81 min(-1) to 3 19.2 +/- 104.01 min(-1) while in the BDP MDI group the increase was from 301.5 +/- 94.71 min(-1) to 309.3 +/- 86.71 min(-1). The two treatments were equally well tolerated.A total of 19 patients in each group reported adverse events during the treatment period, and these were generally mild-moderate in severity. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that BDP suspension for nebulization 3,000-4,000 microg day(-1) given via a nebulizer and BDP spray 1,500-2,000 microg day(-1) given via an MDI plus spacer are equally effective, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, when used in steroid-dependent adult patients with moderate to severe asthma.

摘要

雾化吸入高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素对依赖激素的哮喘患者有益。这项双盲、双模拟、多中心、随机、平行组研究的目的是比较雾化吸入或定量气雾剂吸入高剂量糖皮质激素对成年哮喘患者的疗效和安全性。在为期2周的导入期后,124名年龄在18至70岁、接受高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗的中重度哮喘患者被随机分为两个治疗组,为期12周:通过雾化器给予丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)混悬液雾化吸入,3000 - 4000μg/天,一日两次(n = 63),或通过定量气雾剂(MDI)加储雾罐给予BDP气雾剂,1500 - 2000μg/天,一日两次(BDP MDI)(n = 61)。在研究结束时,两个治疗组在评估的各种疗效参数(肺功能测试、临床症状评分和急救沙丁胺醇的使用)方面均较基线有可比的改善,大多数情况下具有统计学意义。主要疗效终点是早晨肺呼气流量率(PEFR)。在意向性治疗人群中,BDP雾化组早晨平均PEFR从308.7±107.8l/min显著增加至319.2±104.0l/min,而BDP MDI组从301.5±94.7l/min增加至309.3±86.7l/min。两种治疗的耐受性相当。每组共有19名患者在治疗期间报告了不良事件,严重程度一般为轻至中度。总之,本研究结果表明,对于依赖激素的成年中重度哮喘患者,通过雾化器给予3000 - 4000μg/天的BDP混悬液雾化吸入和通过MDI加储雾罐给予1500 - 2000μg/天的BDP气雾剂同样有效,安全性和耐受性均可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验