Suppr超能文献

布地奈德丙酸酯和氟替卡松丙酸酯混悬液雾化吸入治疗成年持续性哮喘患者的疗效比较

Comparison of the efficacy of beclometasone dipropionate and fluticasone propionate suspensions for nebulization in adult patients with persistent asthma.

作者信息

Terzano C, Ricci A, Burinschi V, Nekam K, Lahovsky J

机构信息

University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2003 Feb;97 Suppl B:S35-40.

Abstract

The use of nebulization for the administration of inhaled steroids plays an important role in asthma patients who are unable to use pressurized aerosol or dry-powder inhalers effectively. Moreover, the type of nebulizer used may affect how much drug is delivered to the lungs. The objective of this multinational, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids in adult patients with chronic asthma. Following a 1-week placebo run-in period, 205 patients, aged 18-65 years, with moderate persistent asthma were randomized to one of two treatment groups for 12 weeks: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) suspension for nebulization 2,400 microg day(-1) b.i.d. (n = 103), or fluticasone propionate (FP) suspension for nebulization 2,000 microg day(-1) b.i.d. (n = 102), both administered by a jet nebulizer Comparable efficacy in controlling asthma was demonstrated by the two treatments at study end, as evident when evaluating various efficacy parameters (pulmonary function tests, asthma exacerbations and symptoms, and the use of rescue salbutamol). The primary efficacy endpoint was the variation in the pulmonary expiratory flow (PEF) at treatment end over the baseline visit. For the intent-to-treat population, in the BDP group mean PEF values increased statistically significantly from 5.2 +/- 1.31 s(-1) to 5.7 +/- 1.61 s(-1), while in the FP group the increase was from 5.2 +/- 1.21 s(-1) to 5.8 +/- 1.81 s(-1). Mean PEF values as per cent of predicted also increased in a statistically significant way, from 71% to 77.1 % in the BDP group, and from 70.1% to 76.9% in the FP group. The two treatments were equally well tolerated.A total of 23 and 32 patients in the BDP and FP groups, respectively, reported adverse events during the treatment period, and these were generally mild. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that BDP 2,400 microg day(-1) and FP 2,000 microg day(-1), both suspensions for nebulization administered via a jet nebulizer, are equally effective, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, when used in adult patients with moderate persistent asthma.

摘要

对于无法有效使用压力定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器的哮喘患者,雾化吸入糖皮质激素发挥着重要作用。此外,所使用的雾化器类型可能会影响输送到肺部的药物量。这项多国、多中心、随机、活性对照、平行组研究的目的是比较雾化糖皮质激素在成年慢性哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。在为期1周的安慰剂导入期后,205名年龄在18至65岁之间的中度持续性哮喘患者被随机分为两个治疗组,为期12周:布地奈德二丙酸酯(BDP)雾化混悬液2400微克/天,每日两次(n = 103),或丙酸氟替卡松(FP)雾化混悬液2000微克/天,每日两次(n = 102),均通过喷射雾化器给药。在研究结束时,两种治疗在控制哮喘方面显示出相当的疗效,在评估各种疗效参数(肺功能测试、哮喘加重和症状以及急救沙丁胺醇的使用)时很明显。主要疗效终点是治疗结束时相对于基线访视的肺呼气流量(PEF)变化。对于意向性治疗人群,在BDP组中,平均PEF值从5.2±1.31秒⁻¹统计学显著增加至5.7±1.61秒⁻¹,而在FP组中,增加幅度从5.2±1.21秒⁻¹至5.8±1.81秒⁻¹。预测值百分比的平均PEF值也有统计学显著增加,BDP组从71%增至77.1%,FP组从70.1%增至76.9%。两种治疗的耐受性相当。BDP组和FP组分别有23名和32名患者在治疗期间报告了不良事件,且这些事件通常较轻。总之,本研究结果表明,对于成年中度持续性哮喘患者,通过喷射雾化器给药的BDP 2400微克/天和FP 2000微克/天的雾化混悬液同样有效,具有可接受的安全性和耐受性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验