Bisca N, Cernatescu I, Dragomir D, Iacomi A, Mirceau M, Orascanu D
Institute of Pneumophysiology Marius Nasta, Bucharest, Romania.
Respir Med. 2003 Feb;97 Suppl B:S15-20.
Nebulization simplifies the administration of effective inhaled medications to young asthmatics who experience hand-to-lung co-ordination problems and inspiratory difficulties associated with metered-dose and dry-powder inhalers, respectively. The objective of this double-blind, double-dummy multicentre, randomized, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids given by nebulization or metered-dose inhalation in paediatric patients with exacerbation of asthma. Following a 24-h run-in period, 151 patients, aged 6-16years, with moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma were randomized to one of two treatment groups for 4 weeks: beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) suspension for nebulization 1,600 microg day(-1) b.i.d. given via a nebulizer (n = 75), or BDP spray 800 microg day(-1) b.i.d. given via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer (BDP MDI) (n = 76). Superimposable and statistically significant improvements over baseline were noted at study end for the two treatment groups in the various efficacy parameters evaluated (pulmonary function tests, asthma symptoms scores, and the use of rescue salbutamol). The primary efficacy endpoint was the morning pulmonary expiratory flow rate (PEFR). In the BDP nebulization group, mean morning PEFR increased statistically significantly from 233.2 +/- 86.31 min(-1) to 322.0 +/- 101.81 min(-1), while in the BDP MDI group the increase was from 222.9 +/- 87.31 min(-1) to 314.9 +/- 96.61 min(-1). Moreover, an additional 4-week treatment period at half doses, completed by 26 patients, demonstrated that improvements were maintained or further enhanced. The two treatments were equally well tolerated. A total of 25 and 26 patients in the BDP nebulization and BDP MDI groups, respectively reported adverse events during the treatment period, and these were generally mild. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that BDP suspension for nebulization 1,600 microg day(-1) given via a nebulizer and BDP spray 800 microg day(-1) given via an MDI plus spacer are equally effective, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, when used in paediatric patients with moderate to severe asthma exacerbation.
雾化吸入简化了向患有哮喘的儿童给药有效吸入药物的过程,这些儿童分别存在与定量吸入器和干粉吸入器相关的手肺协调问题和吸气困难。这项双盲、双模拟、多中心、随机、平行组研究的目的是比较雾化吸入或定量吸入皮质类固醇对哮喘加重期儿科患者的疗效和安全性。在24小时的导入期后,151名年龄在6至16岁、患有中度至重度哮喘加重的患者被随机分为两个治疗组之一,为期4周:通过雾化器给予丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)混悬液1600μg/天,每日两次(n = 75),或通过定量吸入器(MDI)加储雾罐给予BDP气雾剂800μg/天,每日两次(BDP MDI)(n = 76)。在研究结束时,两个治疗组在评估的各种疗效参数(肺功能测试、哮喘症状评分和急救沙丁胺醇的使用)方面均比基线有统计学上显著的改善。主要疗效终点是早晨肺呼气流量率(PEFR)。在BDP雾化组中,早晨平均PEFR从233.2±86.31L/min显著增加到322.0±101.81L/min,而在BDP MDI组中,增加幅度从222.9±87.31L/min到314.9±96.61L/min。此外,26名患者完成了为期4周的半剂量额外治疗期,结果表明改善得以维持或进一步增强。两种治疗的耐受性相当。BDP雾化组和BDP MDI组分别有25名和26名患者在治疗期间报告了不良事件,且这些事件通常为轻度。总之,本研究结果表明,通过雾化器给予16小时/天的BDP混悬液和通过MDI加储雾罐给予800μg/天的BDP气雾剂在用于中度至重度哮喘加重的儿科患者时同样有效,且安全性和耐受性良好。