Nawasreh O, Fraihat A
Prince Rashid Ben Al-Hasan Hospital, Al-Husn, Jordan.
East Mediterr Health J. 2001 Jan-Mar;7(1-2):26-30.
We compared the therapeutic efficiency of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and gentamicin sulfate in the treatment of chronic otitis media. A total of 88 patients aged 9-62 years with chronic suppurative media were randomly placed into two groups. In the first group, 48 patients (54.5%) received topical ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, while in the second group 40 patients (45.5%) received local gentamicin sulfate. Of the 48 patients who received ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 42 (87.5%) were cured, while in 6 patients (12.5%) the treatment failed. In the gentamicin group, 12 (30%) of the patients were cured, while 28 patients showed no clinical or bacteriological improvement. Topical ciprofloxacin is safe and more efficacious and efficient than topical gentamicin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic suppurative otitis media.
我们比较了盐酸环丙沙星和硫酸庆大霉素治疗慢性中耳炎的疗效。共有88例年龄在9至62岁的慢性化脓性中耳炎患者被随机分为两组。第一组48例患者(54.5%)接受局部盐酸环丙沙星治疗,而第二组40例患者(45.5%)接受局部硫酸庆大霉素治疗。在接受盐酸环丙沙星治疗的48例患者中,42例(87.5%)治愈,6例(12.5%)治疗失败。在庆大霉素组中,12例(30%)患者治愈,28例患者在临床或细菌学方面无改善。局部应用环丙沙星在治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎急性发作方面比局部应用庆大霉素更安全、更有效。