Bengtsson Boel
Department of Ophthalmology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Mar;44(3):1388-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0169.
To develop and test a short and reliable visual field threshold program for the early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss, by adapting the Swedish interactive test algorithm (SITA) to short-wavelength-automated-perimetry (SWAP).
Computer simulations were performed to test the accuracy of several versions of SITA SWAP, and to optimize speed versus reliability. The selected SITA SWAP version was evaluated and compared with the older Full Threshold SWAP and Fastpac SWAP programs in 41 patients with glaucoma and normal subjects.
Average test time was 3.6 minutes for SITA SWAP, 11.8 minutes for Full Threshold SWAP, and 7.7 minutes for Fastpac SWAP, differences were significant at P < 0.0001. Mean threshold reproducibility, calculated as absolute difference between two tests, did not differ significantly between programs and was 2.4 dB for SITA, 2.3 dB for Full Threshold, and 2.4 dB for Fastpac SWAP. Simultaneous comparison showed significant differences in threshold sensitivity, P = 0.023: SITA SWAP showed highest sensitivity, 21.6 dB on average, compared with both Full Threshold SWAP and Fastpac SWAP with a mean sensitivity of 17.3 and 17.8 dB, respectively.
SITA SWAP was much faster than the older SWAP strategies, and reproducibility did not differ. This implies that SITA SWAP could become a clinically useful method for the detection of early glaucoma. SWAP tests may also be applicable in larger groups of patients because of the increased dynamic range.
通过将瑞典交互式测试算法(SITA)应用于短波长自动视野计(SWAP),开发并测试一种简短且可靠的视野阈值程序,用于早期检测青光眼性视野缺损。
进行计算机模拟,以测试多个版本的SITA SWAP的准确性,并优化速度与可靠性之间的关系。在41例青光眼患者和正常受试者中,对所选的SITA SWAP版本进行评估,并与较旧的全阈值SWAP和快速Pac SWAP程序进行比较。
SITA SWAP的平均测试时间为3.6分钟,全阈值SWAP为11.8分钟,快速Pac SWAP为7.7分钟,差异在P<0.0001时具有统计学意义。以两次测试之间的绝对差异计算的平均阈值可重复性在各程序之间无显著差异,SITA为2.4dB,全阈值为2.3dB,快速Pac SWAP为2.4dB。同时比较显示阈值敏感性存在显著差异,P = 0.023:SITA SWAP显示出最高的敏感性,平均为21.6dB,而全阈值SWAP和快速Pac SWAP的平均敏感性分别为17.3dB和17.8dB。
SITA SWAP比旧的SWAP策略快得多,且可重复性没有差异。这意味着SITA SWAP可能成为检测早期青光眼的一种临床有用方法。由于动态范围增加,SWAP测试也可能适用于更大的患者群体。