• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于短波长自动视野计的新型快速阈值算法。

A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.

作者信息

Bengtsson Boel

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Mar;44(3):1388-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0169.

DOI:10.1167/iovs.02-0169
PMID:12601072
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and test a short and reliable visual field threshold program for the early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss, by adapting the Swedish interactive test algorithm (SITA) to short-wavelength-automated-perimetry (SWAP).

METHODS

Computer simulations were performed to test the accuracy of several versions of SITA SWAP, and to optimize speed versus reliability. The selected SITA SWAP version was evaluated and compared with the older Full Threshold SWAP and Fastpac SWAP programs in 41 patients with glaucoma and normal subjects.

RESULTS

Average test time was 3.6 minutes for SITA SWAP, 11.8 minutes for Full Threshold SWAP, and 7.7 minutes for Fastpac SWAP, differences were significant at P < 0.0001. Mean threshold reproducibility, calculated as absolute difference between two tests, did not differ significantly between programs and was 2.4 dB for SITA, 2.3 dB for Full Threshold, and 2.4 dB for Fastpac SWAP. Simultaneous comparison showed significant differences in threshold sensitivity, P = 0.023: SITA SWAP showed highest sensitivity, 21.6 dB on average, compared with both Full Threshold SWAP and Fastpac SWAP with a mean sensitivity of 17.3 and 17.8 dB, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SITA SWAP was much faster than the older SWAP strategies, and reproducibility did not differ. This implies that SITA SWAP could become a clinically useful method for the detection of early glaucoma. SWAP tests may also be applicable in larger groups of patients because of the increased dynamic range.

摘要

目的

通过将瑞典交互式测试算法(SITA)应用于短波长自动视野计(SWAP),开发并测试一种简短且可靠的视野阈值程序,用于早期检测青光眼性视野缺损。

方法

进行计算机模拟,以测试多个版本的SITA SWAP的准确性,并优化速度与可靠性之间的关系。在41例青光眼患者和正常受试者中,对所选的SITA SWAP版本进行评估,并与较旧的全阈值SWAP和快速Pac SWAP程序进行比较。

结果

SITA SWAP的平均测试时间为3.6分钟,全阈值SWAP为11.8分钟,快速Pac SWAP为7.7分钟,差异在P<0.0001时具有统计学意义。以两次测试之间的绝对差异计算的平均阈值可重复性在各程序之间无显著差异,SITA为2.4dB,全阈值为2.3dB,快速Pac SWAP为2.4dB。同时比较显示阈值敏感性存在显著差异,P = 0.023:SITA SWAP显示出最高的敏感性,平均为21.6dB,而全阈值SWAP和快速Pac SWAP的平均敏感性分别为17.3dB和17.8dB。

结论

SITA SWAP比旧的SWAP策略快得多,且可重复性没有差异。这意味着SITA SWAP可能成为检测早期青光眼的一种临床有用方法。由于动态范围增加,SWAP测试也可能适用于更大的患者群体。

相似文献

1
A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.一种用于短波长自动视野计的新型快速阈值算法。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Mar;44(3):1388-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0169.
2
Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.早期青光眼患者中快蓝黄视野检查与标准自动视野计检查的诊断敏感性:不同检测程序的比较
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jul;113(7):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.028.
3
SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.SITA快速阈值视野检查法,一种新的快速视野阈值检查法。方法描述及在显性和可疑青光眼患者中的评估
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998 Aug;76(4):431-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760408.x.
4
Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.标准自动视野计、频域技术视野计和短波长自动视野计在青光眼检测中的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 21;52(10):7325-31. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7795.
5
Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.自动视野计:美国眼科学会报告
Ophthalmology. 2002 Dec;109(12):2362-74. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01726-8.
6
Normal intersubject threshold variability and normal limits of the SITA SWAP and full threshold SWAP perimetric programs.SITA SWAP和全阈值SWAP视野检查程序的正常受试者间阈值变异性及正常范围。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Nov;44(11):5029-34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1220.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.瑞典交互式阈值算法对青光眼性视野缺损的敏感性和特异性。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01047-3.
8
Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.比较全阈值和瑞典交互式阈值算法用于短波长自动视野计检查。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1726-33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2718. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
9
Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.两种视野检查策略(SITA Fast和CLIP)在受损视野中阈值估计及学习效应的评估
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):182-90. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800204.
10
Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?瑞典交互式阈值算法(SITA)能否准确描绘出与vigabatrin相关的视野缺损情况?
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 23;14:166. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-166.

引用本文的文献

1
Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry, and Optical Coherence Tomography in Dominant Optic Atrophy.短波长自动视野计、标准自动视野计及光学相干断层扫描在显性视神经萎缩中的应用
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 28;13(7):1971. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071971.
2
A Method for Reducing the Number of Presentations in Perimetric Test Procedures.一种减少视野检查程序中检查次数的方法。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.4.14.
3
Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
标准自动视野计、短波长自动视野计和频率加倍技术视野计在监测青光眼进展方面的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(7):e2618. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002618.
4
Long-term variability in short-wavelength automated perimetry compared to standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.青光眼患者和正常受试者中,短波长自动视野计与标准视野计相比的长期变异性。
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;2(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.48419.
5
African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes.非洲裔与青光眼评估研究(ADAGES):III. 健康眼睛视觉功能的血统差异
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 May;128(5):551-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.58.
6
Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.比较全阈值和瑞典交互式阈值算法用于短波长自动视野计检查。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Apr;50(4):1726-33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2718. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
7
Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma.评估患者对青光眼治疗中使用的不同临床检查的看法。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.013.
8
Diagnostic tools for glaucoma detection and management.用于青光眼检测与管理的诊断工具。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;53 Suppl1(SUPPL1):S17-32. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.003.
9
Visual function-specific perimetry to identify glaucomatous visual loss using three different definitions of visual field abnormality.使用三种不同的视野异常定义,进行视觉功能特异性视野检查以识别青光眼性视力丧失。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;50(3):1234-40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2535. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
10
Visual fields correlate better than visual acuity to severity of diabetic retinopathy.与糖尿病视网膜病变的严重程度相比,视野的相关性优于视力。
Diabetologia. 2005 Dec;48(12):2494-500. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0001-x. Epub 2005 Nov 1.