Nifong L Wiley, Chu Victor F, Bailey B Marcus, Maziarz David M, Sorrell Vincent L, Holbert Donald, Chitwood W Randolph
Department of Surgery and the Center for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Feb;75(2):438-42; discussion 443. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04554-x.
As part of a Food and Drug Administration trial, mitral repairs were performed in 38 patients using the robotic da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Mountain View, CA). Prospectively, we evaluated safety and efficacy in performing both simple and complex mitral repairs.
Eligible patients had nonischemic moderate to severe mitral insufficiency. Operative techniques included peripheral cardiopulmonary perfusion, a 4- to 5-cm mini-thoracotomy, transthoracic aortic occlusion, and antegrade blood cardioplegia. Transesophageal echocardiograms were done intraoperatively with three-dimensional reconstructions. Successful repairs were defined as mild or less residual regurgitation.
Enhanced three-dimensional visualization of mitral leaflets and the subvalvar apparatus allowed safe, dexterous intracardiac tissue manipulation. All patients had successful valve repairs including quadrangular resections, sliding plasties, and edge-to-edge approximations, as well as both chordal transfers and replacements. There were no operative deaths, strokes, or device-related complications. One patient required valve replacement for hemolysis and 1 was reexplored for bleeding. There were no incisional conversions. Both robotic repair and total operating times decreased significantly from 1.9 +/- 0.1 and 5.1 +/- 0.1 hours (mean +/- standard error of the mean) for the first 19 patients to 1.5 +/- 0.1 (p = 0.002) and 4.4 +/- 0.1 hours (p = 0.04) for the last 19 operations, respectively. Total hospital length of stay for patients was 3.8 +/- 0.6 days. Of all patients, 31 (82%) had a 4-day or less length of stay. Seven patients (18%) had stays between 5 and 9 days (6.4 +/- 1.0).
This study shows that the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc) has few limitations in performing complex valve repairs. Articulated wrist-like instruments and three-dimensional visualization enabled precise tissue telemanipulation. Future robotic design advances and adjunctive suture technologies may promote continuing evolution of robotic cardiac operations.
作为美国食品药品监督管理局试验的一部分,使用达芬奇机器人手术系统(直观外科公司,加利福尼亚州山景城)对38例患者进行了二尖瓣修复术。我们前瞻性地评估了进行简单和复杂二尖瓣修复的安全性和有效性。
符合条件的患者患有非缺血性中度至重度二尖瓣反流。手术技术包括外周体外循环、4至5厘米的小切口开胸术、经胸主动脉阻断和顺行血液心脏停搏。术中进行经食管超声心动图检查并进行三维重建。成功修复定义为残余反流轻度或更低。
二尖瓣叶和瓣下装置的增强三维可视化允许安全、灵活的心内组织操作。所有患者均成功进行了瓣膜修复,包括四边形切除术、滑动修补术、边缘对边缘缝合,以及腱索转移和置换。无手术死亡、中风或与器械相关的并发症。1例患者因溶血需要瓣膜置换,1例因出血再次手术探查。无切口转换。机器人修复和总手术时间均显著缩短,前19例患者的时间分别为1.9±0.1小时和5.1±0.1小时(平均值±平均标准误差),后19例手术分别为1.5±0.1小时(p = 0.002)和4.4±0.1小时(p = 0.04)。患者的总住院时间为3.8±0.6天。所有患者中,31例(82%)住院时间为4天或更短。7例患者(18%)住院时间为5至9天(6.4±1.0)。
本研究表明,达芬奇手术系统(直观外科公司)在进行复杂瓣膜修复方面几乎没有局限性。类似手腕的关节器械和三维可视化实现了精确的组织远程操作。未来机器人设计的进步和辅助缝合技术可能会推动机器人心脏手术的持续发展。