Buyukyilmaz Tamer, Usumez Serdar, Karaman Ali Ihya
Department of Orthodontics, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):64-70. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0064:EOSEPO>2.0.CO;2.
Currently introduced self-etching primers combine conditioning and priming agents into a single product. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using three self-etching primers on the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets and on the bracket/adhesive failure mode. Brackets were bonded to extracted human teeth according to one of four protocols. In the control group, teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. In the experimental groups, the enamel was conditioned with three different self-etching primers, Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Etch & Prime 3.0 (EP3), or Transbond Plus (TBP), as suggested by the manufacturer. The brackets were then bonded with Transbond XT in all groups. The present in vitro findings indicate that conditioning with TBP before bonding orthodontic brackets to the enamel surface resulted in a significantly (P < or = .001) higher SBS (mean, 16.0 +/- 4.5 MPa) than that found in CSE, EP3, and the control (acid-etched [AE]) groups. CSE produced bond strength values (mean 11.5 +/- 3.3 MPa) that are statistically comparable to those produced by acid etching (mean 13.1 +/- 3.1 MPa). The use of EP3 for enamel conditioning resulted in the lowest mean SBS value (mean 9.9 +/- 4.0 MPa). A comparison of the adhesive remnant index scores indicated that there was more residual adhesive remaining on the teeth that were treated with conventional acid etching than in the CSE and EP3 groups. In the TBP group, the failure sites were similar to those of the AE group but different from those of the CSE group.
目前推出的自酸蚀底漆将酸蚀剂和底漆结合在一种产品中。本研究的目的是确定使用三种自酸蚀底漆对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度(SBS)以及托槽/粘结剂失效模式的影响。根据四种方案之一将托槽粘结到拔除的人牙上。在对照组中,牙齿用37%的磷酸酸蚀。在实验组中,按照制造商的建议,用三种不同的自酸蚀底漆Clearfil SE Bond(CSE)、Etch & Prime 3.0(EP3)或Transbond Plus(TBP)对牙釉质进行酸蚀处理。然后在所有组中用Transbond XT粘结托槽。目前的体外研究结果表明,在将正畸托槽粘结到牙釉质表面之前用TBP进行酸蚀处理,其SBS显著更高(P≤0.001)(平均值为16.0±4.5MPa),高于CSE组、EP3组和对照组(酸蚀[AE]组)。CSE产生的粘结强度值(平均值为11.5±3.3MPa)与酸蚀产生的粘结强度值(平均值为13.1±3.1MPa)在统计学上具有可比性。使用EP3进行牙釉质酸蚀处理导致最低的平均SBS值(平均值为9.9±4.0MPa)。粘结剂残留指数评分的比较表明,与CSE组和EP3组相比,用传统酸蚀处理的牙齿上残留的粘结剂更多。在TBP组中,失效部位与AE组相似,但与CSE组不同。