Conservative Dentistry Teaching Unit, Dental Clinic, University of Murcia, Spain.
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):291-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp128. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect on shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant, and enamel surface of repeated bonding of new brackets on the same tooth using different methods of enamel conditioning. One hundred and thirty-five bovine incisors were used. Brackets were bonded to enamel using one of the following conditioning procedures: (1) 37 per cent phosphoric acid, (2) 37 per cent phosphoric acid (prior to first bond but not for further bonds), (3) Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP), and (4) non-rinse-conditioner (NRC). Brackets were sequentially bonded and debonded three times following the same conditioning procedure with the exception of group 2 where 37 per cent phosphoric acid was not reapplied prior to the second and third bonding sequences. SBS and adhesive remnant were evaluated for each debond. Scanning electron microscopy observations were made for each conditioning sequence. Statistical analysis was undertaken using ANOVA, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Bond strength and adhesive remnant values were similar across the four groups for the first and second bonding sequences. At the third sequence, SBS was significantly less (P < 0.008) for group 2 (5.71 +/- 1.56 MPa) than for group 1 (9.42 +/- 2.75 MPa) and the adhesive remnant was significantly lower (P < 0.008) for group 2 (6.93% +/- 3.34) than for the other groups (group 1: 16.95 +/- 4.99 per cent, group 3: 14.40 +/- 5.11 per cent, and group 4: 14.60 +/- 5.33 per cent). When comparing the SBS and adhesive remnant of the three bonding/debonding sequences within each group, both the SBS and adhesive remnant for group 2 (SBS: 5.71 +/- 1.56 MPa and adhesive remnant: 6.93 +/- 3.34%) at the third sequence were significantly less (P < 0.017) than at the first (SBS: 10.44 +/- 3.55 MPa and adhesive remnant: 13.81 +/- 5.59%) and second (SBS: 9.23 +/- 2.69 MPa and adhesive remnant: 15.32 +/- 6.85%) sequences. Enamel changes were similar across all groups. TSEP and NRC produced bonds that were similar to acid etching. When acid etching is used, it is possible to avoid etching for a second bond but not for following bonds.
本研究的目的是评估不同釉质处理方法对同一牙齿上重复粘接新托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS)、残留粘结剂和釉质表面的影响。使用了 135 颗牛切牙。使用以下处理程序之一将托槽粘结到釉质上:(1)37%磷酸,(2)37%磷酸(首次粘结前,但不适用于后续粘结),(3)Transbond Plus 自酸蚀底漆(TSEP)和(4)非冲洗调节剂(NRC)。在同一处理程序下,除了第 2 组在第二和第三粘接序列之前不重新应用 37%磷酸外,连续进行三次粘接和脱粘。每次脱粘后评估 SBS 和残留粘结剂。对每种处理顺序进行扫描电子显微镜观察。使用方差分析、Mann-Whitney 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行统计分析。在第一和第二粘接序列中,四个组的粘结强度和残留粘结剂值相似。在第三序列中,组 2 的 SBS 值显著降低(P <0.008)(5.71 +/- 1.56 MPa),低于组 1(9.42 +/- 2.75 MPa),组 2 的残留粘结剂显著降低(P <0.008)(6.93% +/- 3.34%),低于其他组(组 1:16.95 +/- 4.99%,组 3:14.40 +/- 5.11%,组 4:14.60 +/- 5.33%)。当比较每组内三次粘接/脱粘的 SBS 和残留粘结剂值时,组 2 的 SBS(5.71 +/- 1.56 MPa)和残留粘结剂(6.93 +/- 3.34%)在第三序列时均显著降低(P <0.017),而在第一序列时(SBS:10.44 +/- 3.55 MPa,残留粘结剂:13.81 +/- 5.59%)和第二序列时(SBS:9.23 +/- 2.69 MPa,残留粘结剂:15.32 +/- 6.85%)。所有组的釉质变化相似。TSEP 和 NRC 产生的粘结与酸蚀相似。当使用酸蚀时,可以避免第二次粘结,但不能避免后续粘结。