Bair Aaron E, Panacek Edward A, Wisner David H, Bales Ryan, Sakles John C
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):151-6. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00715-1.
We describe the prevalence, primary indications and immediate complications of emergency cricothyrotomy (cric) techniques, in a single institution's Emergency Department (ED) and associated air-medical transport service. This is a retrospective review at an academic, level-one trauma center with an annual ED census of 65,000 and an associated air-medical transport service (AMTS). All patients undergoing cric in the field or in the ED between July 1995 and June 2000 were included. Expert reviewers from Emergency Medicine, Trauma Surgery and the AMTS prospectively defined the complication criteria. All charts with a possible complication underwent a blinded evaluation by reviewers representing each of the three clinical services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Fifty crics were performed over 5 years. Seventy-six percent of crics were performed in trauma patients. The prevalence of cric in patients requiring airway management in the ED was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7-1.6) and 10.9% (95% CI, 6.9-16.1) in the field by the AMTS. The prevalence of complications was 14% (95% CI, 4-32.6) in ED patients and 54.5% (95% CI, 32-75.6) for prehospital patients. The overall inter-rater agreement for complication rate was excellent (kappa =.87). Overall, 77% of crics were performed using the rapid four-step technique (RFST). There were no reports of complications associated with the RFST when performed in the ED. Non-RFST crics in the ED had an associated complication rate of 25% (95% CI, 2.8-60). Emergency cricothyrotomy was performed in approximately 1% of all emergency airway cases in the ED and at a higher rate by the AMTS. The most frequent indications were trauma related. Additionally, the RFST was the most commonly used technique for cric at this institution. The complication rate of cric was significantly higher in the prehospital environment than in the ED.
我们描述了在一家机构的急诊科(ED)及相关空中医疗运输服务中,紧急环甲膜切开术(cric)技术的发生率、主要适应证及即刻并发症。这是一项在一所学术性一级创伤中心进行的回顾性研究,该中心急诊科年接诊量为65000人次,并拥有相关空中医疗运输服务(AMTS)。纳入了1995年7月至2000年6月期间在现场或急诊科接受环甲膜切开术的所有患者。急诊医学、创伤外科和空中医疗运输服务的专家评审员前瞻性地定义了并发症标准。所有可能存在并发症的病历均由代表这三个临床科室的评审员进行盲法评估。采用描述性统计来总结数据。5年期间共进行了50例环甲膜切开术。76%的环甲膜切开术在创伤患者中实施。在急诊科需要气道管理的患者中,环甲膜切开术的发生率为1.1%(95%可信区间,0.7 - 1.6),而在空中医疗运输服务中现场发生率为10.9%(95%可信区间,6.9 - 16.1)。急诊科患者的并发症发生率为14%(95%可信区间,4 - 32.6),院前患者为54.5%(95%可信区间,32 - 75.6)。并发症发生率的总体评分者间一致性极佳(kappa = 0.87)。总体而言,77%的环甲膜切开术采用快速四步法技术(RFST)。在急诊科实施RFST时,未报告与之相关的并发症。急诊科非RFST环甲膜切开术的相关并发症发生率为25%(95%可信区间,2.8 - 60)。在急诊科,紧急环甲膜切开术约占所有紧急气道病例的1%,在空中医疗运输服务中发生率更高。最常见的适应证与创伤相关。此外,RFST是该机构最常用的环甲膜切开术技术。环甲膜切开术的并发症发生率在院前环境中显著高于急诊科。