Fortune J B, Judkins D G, Scanzaroli D, McLeod K B, Johnson S B
Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
J Trauma. 1997 May;42(5):832-6; discussion 837-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199705000-00013.
The use of surgical cricothyrotomy (SC) in the prehospital setting is controversial, and the need to teach this procedure to paramedics and intermediate emergency medical technicians remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to define the efficacy, complication rate, and overall survival after SC performed in the prehospital setting.
In our region, emergency medical technicians receive training in this technique using an animal model with bi-annual updates required. We retrospectively reviewed data in our regional trauma register (15,686 injured patients) for the years 1991-1995.
Prehospital emergency airway intubation was required in 376 patients, 56 of whom received SC. The primary indications for SC were facial fractures and deformities (32%) and blood in the airway (30%). In 79% of the patients requiring SC, attempted orotracheal intubation prior to SC was unsuccessful, with a mean of 1.9 attempts per patient. SC was judged to provide an adequate airway in the field in 89% of attempts. Complications at the scene included six failed attempts, one case of excessive bleeding, and one adverse patient reaction (agitation). When patients arrived at the trauma center, the SC was judged to be acceptable in 64%, whereas 16% were functioning with some question of adequacy and required airway manipulation (most commonly a mainstem bronchial intubation). Overall survival to hospital discharge was 27%; however, survival to emergency department discharge (an indicator of emergency airway adequacy) was 62%. Using TRISS methodology, there were five unexpected survivors and six unexpected deaths. Only three patients were discharged with a "good neurologic recovery."
(1) Prehospital SC can be performed effectively with few complications after training on animal models (2) Good neurologic outcome is rare after the use of this procedure. (3) Although it is effective, clear indications must be developed and followed for the prehospital use of SC.
在院前环境中使用外科环甲膜切开术(SC)存在争议,而向护理人员和中级急救医疗技术人员传授该操作的必要性仍不明确。本研究的目的是确定院前实施SC后的疗效、并发症发生率和总体生存率。
在我们地区,急救医疗技术人员使用动物模型接受该技术培训,且每两年需要更新。我们回顾性分析了1991 - 1995年我们地区创伤登记处(15686例受伤患者)的数据。
376例患者需要进行院前紧急气道插管,其中56例接受了SC。SC的主要指征是面部骨折和畸形(32%)以及气道内有血液(30%)。在79%需要SC的患者中,SC前尝试经口气管插管未成功,平均每位患者尝试1.9次。89%的尝试中,SC被判定在现场提供了足够的气道。现场并发症包括6次尝试失败、1例出血过多和1例患者不良反应(躁动)。当患者到达创伤中心时,64%的SC被判定为可接受,而16%的功能存在一些关于是否足够的问题,需要气道操作(最常见的是主支气管插管)。总体出院生存率为27%;然而,急诊科出院生存率(紧急气道是否足够的指标)为62%。使用TRISS方法,有5例意外存活者和6例意外死亡。只有3例患者出院时“神经功能恢复良好”。
(1)在动物模型上训练后,院前SC可以有效实施且并发症较少。(2)使用该操作后很少有良好的神经功能结局。(3)尽管有效,但必须制定并遵循明确的指征用于院前SC的使用。