Jones Helen, Edwards Lynn, Vallis T Michael, Ruggiero Laurie, Rossi Susan R, Rossi Joseph S, Greene Geoffrey, Prochaska James O, Zinman Bernard
Leadership Sinai Center for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):732-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.732.
This study compared diabetes Treatment As Usual (TAU) with Pathways To Change (PTC), an intervention developed from the Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM), to determine whether the PTC intervention would result in greater readiness to change, greater increases in self-care, and improved diabetes control.
Participants were stratified by diabetes treatment and randomized to treatment with PTC or TAU as well as being randomized regarding receipt of free blood testing strips. The PTC consisted of stage-matched personalized assessment reports, self-help manuals, newsletters, and individual phone counseling designed to improve readiness for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), healthy eating, and/or smoking cessation. A total of 1029 individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who were in one of three pre-action stages for either SMBG, healthy eating, or smoking were recruited.
For the SMBG intervention, 43.4% of those receiving PTC plus strips moved to an action stage, as well as 30.5% of those receiving PTC alone, 27.0% of those receiving TAU plus strips, and 18.4% of those receiving TAU alone (P < 0.001). For the healthy eating intervention, more participants who received PTC than TAU (32.5 vs. 25.8%) moved to action or maintenance (P < 0.001). For the smoking intervention, more participants receiving PTC (24.3%) than TAU (13.4%) moved to an action stage (P < 0.03). In intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of those receiving the SMBG intervention, PTC resulted in a greater reduction of HbA(1c) than TAU, but this did not reach statistical significance. However, in those who moved to an action stage for the SMBG and healthy eating interventions, HbA(1c) was significantly reduced (P < 0 0.001). Individuals who received the healthy eating intervention decreased their percentage of calories from fat to a greater extent (35.2 vs. 36.1%, P = 0.004), increased servings of fruit per day (1.89 vs. 1.68, P = 0.016), and increased vegetable servings (2.24 vs. 2.06, P = 0.011) but did not decrease weight. However, weight loss for individuals who received the healthy eating intervention and who increased SMBG frequency as recommended was significantly greater, with a 0.26-kg loss in those who remained in a pre-action SMBG stage but a 1.78-kg loss in those performed SMBG as recommended (P <or= 0. 01).
This study demonstrates that this intervention has the potential of positively impacting the health of broad populations of individuals with diabetes, not just the minority who are ready for change.
本研究将常规糖尿病治疗(TAU)与基于行为改变阶段理论(TTM)开发的“改变途径”(PTC)干预措施进行比较,以确定PTC干预是否会带来更强的改变意愿、更多的自我护理行为增加以及更好的糖尿病控制效果。
参与者按糖尿病治疗情况分层,随机分配接受PTC或TAU治疗,同时还随机分配是否接受免费血糖测试条。PTC包括根据阶段匹配的个性化评估报告、自助手册、时事通讯以及旨在提高血糖自我监测(SMBG)、健康饮食和/或戒烟意愿的个人电话咨询。共招募了1029名1型和2型糖尿病患者,他们处于SMBG、健康饮食或吸烟三个行动前阶段之一。
对于SMBG干预,接受PTC加测试条的患者中有43.4%进入行动阶段,接受PTC单独治疗的患者中有30.5%进入行动阶段,接受TAU加测试条的患者中有27.0%进入行动阶段,接受TAU单独治疗的患者中有18.4%进入行动阶段(P<0.001)。对于健康饮食干预,接受PTC的参与者比接受TAU的参与者更多(32.5%对25.8%)进入行动或维持阶段(P<0.001)。对于吸烟干预,接受PTC的参与者(24.3%)比接受TAU的参与者(13.4%)更多进入行动阶段(P<0.03)。在接受SMBG干预的患者的意向性分析中,PTC导致糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的降低幅度大于TAU,但未达到统计学显著性。然而,在进入SMBG和健康饮食干预行动阶段的患者中,HbA1c显著降低(P<0.001)。接受健康饮食干预的个体将脂肪热量百分比降低的幅度更大(35.2%对36.1%,P=0.004),每天的水果摄入量增加(1.89份对1.68份,P=0.016),蔬菜摄入量增加(2.24份对2.06份,P=0.0