Hohenwallner W, Sommer R, Wimmer E
Clin Chim Acta. 1976 Jan 2;66(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(76)90367-3.
The between-run precision of the Liebermann-Burchard reaction modified by Watson was, in our laboratory, 2-3%, the within-run coefficient of variation was 1-2%. The between-run precision of the enzymatic test was 3-4%, the within-run coefficient of variation was 3%. The regression analysis of 92 serum specimens from patients was y = -17.31 + 1.04 chi, the coefficient of regression was r = 0.996. Interlaboratory trials of serum cholesterol were studied in the normal and pathological range. Lyophilized samples of serum prepared commercially and from fresh specimens from patients were analysed by the method of Liebermann-Burchard as well as by the enzymatic procedure. Acceptable results estimated by Liebermann-Burchard were obtained in the different laboratories after using a common standard of cholesterol. The coefficient of variation of the enzymatic test in the interlaboratory trial was higher in comparison to the Liebermann-Burchard reaction. Methodological difficulties of the Liebermann-Burchard reaction are discussed and compared with the specific, enzymatic assay.
在我们实验室中,经沃森改良的利伯曼 - 布赫ard反应的批间精密度为2% - 3%,批内变异系数为1% - 2%。酶法检测的批间精密度为3% - 4%,批内变异系数为3%。对92例患者血清标本进行回归分析,结果为y = -17.31 + 1.04x,回归系数r = 0.996。在正常和病理范围内对血清胆固醇进行了实验室间试验。采用利伯曼 - 布赫ard法以及酶法对市售冻干血清样本和患者新鲜标本进行了分析。使用共同的胆固醇标准品后,不同实验室通过利伯曼 - 布赫ard法获得了可接受的结果。与利伯曼 - 布赫ard反应相比,实验室间试验中酶法检测的变异系数更高。讨论了利伯曼 - 布赫ard反应的方法学难点,并与特异性酶法进行了比较。