Tin Win, Walker Sue, Lacamp Camilla
Department of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2003 Mar;4(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-0542(02)00307-x.
A small randomised trial in 1952 showed that excess oxygen use might well be causing a major epidemic of retinal blindness in preterm babies. That single study of just 65 babies was enough to throw doubt on a longstanding treatment strategy of oxygen therapy and highlighted just how powerful a tool the randomised controlled trial could be. Confirmatory evidence from a co-operative trial 4 years later involving 212 babies banished all residual doubt and we should reproach ourselves that we have still not learnt after 50 years how to optimise oxygen delivery to the preterm baby, making further use of this powerful research tool. Two well-conducted trials have recently shown that avoiding subclinical hypoxaemia (a fractional SaO(2) of less than 92%) in babies more than a month old does nothing to improve later growth or development. It is now time the same question was asked of babies less than a month old. This is particularly important in babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation, who currently remain at serious risk of chronic lung disease and permanent retinal damage.
1952年的一项小型随机试验表明,过度使用氧气很可能是导致早产儿视网膜失明大流行的主要原因。这项仅涉及65名婴儿的单一研究足以让人对长期以来的氧气疗法治疗策略产生怀疑,并凸显了随机对照试验这一工具的强大力量。4年后一项涉及212名婴儿的合作试验得出的确证性证据消除了所有残留疑虑,而我们应该自责,50年过去了,我们仍未学会如何优化给早产儿输氧,未能进一步利用这一强大的研究工具。最近两项开展良好的试验表明,对于出生一个月以上的婴儿,避免亚临床低氧血症(动脉血氧饱和度分数低于92%)对改善其后期生长或发育没有任何作用。现在是时候对出生不到一个月的婴儿提出同样的问题了。这对于孕周小于28周的婴儿尤为重要,这些婴儿目前仍面临慢性肺病和永久性视网膜损伤的严重风险。