• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分级处方自付费用对首选品牌药物使用的影响。

Effect of tiered prescription copayments on the use of preferred brand medications.

作者信息

Rector Thomas S, Finch Michael D, Danzon Patricia M, Pauly Mark V, Manda Bharati S

机构信息

Center for Health Care Policy and Evaluation, UnitedHealth Group, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2003 Mar;41(3):398-406. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053022.47132.82.

DOI:10.1097/01.MLR.0000053022.47132.82
PMID:12618643
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Health plans are increasingly using more open drug formularies that offer differential prescription copayments as an incentive to enrollees to use brands that plans prefer. How much this financial incentive affects use of preferred brands has not been widely reported. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of tiered copayments on the choice between preferred and nonpreferred brand medications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Longitudinal logistic regression analyses of pharmacy claims from 1998 and 1999 comparing concurrent groups that were or were not exposed to tiered copayments.

SUBJECTS

Enrollees in four independent physician practice association model health plans who had pharmacy claims for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), proton pump inhibitors (PPI), or hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (STATINS).

OUTCOME MEASURE

Change in the percentage of prescription claims that were for preferred brands.

MAIN RESULTS

Regression adjusted estimates of the average net increase in the percentage use of preferred brands of ACEI, PPI and STATIN from first quarter 1998 to third quarter 1999 attributed to tiered prescription copayments were 13.3 (P = 0.001), 8.9 (P = 0.03), and 6.0 (P <0.001) percentage points, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiered prescription copayments were associated with a significant shift from nonpreferred to preferred brand medications. This type of financial incentive can help purchasers providing open access drug benefits by steering use of medications toward lower cost brands. The clinical effects of changes in medication use brought about differential copayments warrant further investigation.

摘要

背景与目的

健康计划越来越多地采用更开放的药品处方集,提供差异化的处方自付费用,以此激励参保人使用计划所偏好的品牌。这种经济激励对首选品牌使用的影响程度尚未得到广泛报道。本研究的目的是评估分层自付费用对首选和非首选品牌药物选择的影响。

材料与方法

对1998年和1999年药房报销数据进行纵向逻辑回归分析,比较同时期暴露于分层自付费用和未暴露于分层自付费用的组。

研究对象

四个独立医生执业协会模式健康计划的参保人,他们有血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)或羟甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制剂(他汀类药物)的药房报销记录。

观察指标

首选品牌处方报销比例的变化。

主要结果

1998年第一季度至1999年第三季度,归因于分层处方自付费用,ACEI、PPI和他汀类药物首选品牌使用比例平均净增加的回归调整估计值分别为13.3个百分点(P = 0.001)、8.9个百分点(P = 0.03)和6.0个百分点(P <0.001)。

结论

分层处方自付费用与从非首选品牌药物向首选品牌药物的显著转变有关。这种经济激励方式可通过引导药物使用转向低成本品牌,帮助购买者提供开放式药品福利。不同自付费用导致的药物使用变化的临床效果值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Effect of tiered prescription copayments on the use of preferred brand medications.分级处方自付费用对首选品牌药物使用的影响。
Med Care. 2003 Mar;41(3):398-406. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053022.47132.82.
2
The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending.基于激励措施的药品处方集对处方药使用及支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030954.
3
The implications of choice: prescribing generic or preferred pharmaceuticals improves medication adherence for chronic conditions.选择的影响:开具通用药物或首选药物可提高慢性病患者的用药依从性。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):332-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.3.332.
4
Impact of patient and plan design factors on switching to preferred statin therapy.患者及方案设计因素对改用首选他汀类药物治疗的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;41(12):1946-53. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K253. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
5
A bitter pill: formulary variability and the challenge to prescribing physicians.难以下咽的苦药:处方集的变异性及对开处方医生的挑战。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Nov-Dec;17(6):401-7. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.6.401.
6
Relationship between generic and preferred-brand prescription copayment differentials and generic fill rate.普通品牌与首选品牌处方药共付差异与普通药品填充率之间的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):347-52.
7
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.
8
Lowering copayments: impact of simvastatin patent expiration on patient adherence.降低自付费用:辛伐他汀专利到期对患者依从性的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Dec;14(12):813-8.
9
Consumer response to dual incentives under multitiered prescription drug formularies.消费者对多层级处方药处方集下双重激励措施的反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):353-9.
10
Impact of statin copayments on adherence and medical care utilization and expenditures.他汀类药物共付额对依从性、医疗服务利用及支出的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Dec;12 Spec no.:SP11-9.

引用本文的文献

1
An evaluation of prescribing trends and patterns of claims within the Preferred Drugs Initiative in Ireland (20112016): an interrupted time-series study.爱尔兰首选药物倡议(2011 - 2016年)内索赔的处方趋势和模式评估:一项中断时间序列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e019315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019315.
2
The Effect of Florida Medicaid's State-Mandated Formulary Provision on Prescription Drug Use and Health Plan Costs in a Medicaid Managed Care Plan.佛罗里达州医疗补助计划的州定处方集规定对医疗补助管理式医疗计划中处方药使用和健康计划成本的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):124-131. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.124.
3
What is in your wallet? A cluster randomized trial of the effects of showing comparative patient out-of-pocket costs on primary care prescribing for uncomplicated hypertension.
你的钱包里有什么?一项比较患者自付费用对初级保健治疗单纯性高血压处方影响的整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0701-x.
4
The introduction of generic risperidone in Medicare Part D.医保处方药计划D部分中通用型利培酮的引入。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Jan;22(1):41-8.
5
Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?利用免赔额进行患者分流:优先医疗机构的患者数量增加了吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jun;17(5):645-52. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0711-z. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
6
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
7
ENTRY IN THE ADHD DRUGS MARKET: WELFARE IMPACT OF GENERICS AND ME-TOO'S.进入多动症药物市场:仿制药和仿创药的福利影响。
J Ind Econ. 2013 Jun;61(2):339-392. doi: 10.1111/joie.12017.
8
Trends in pharmaceutical expenditures: the impact on drug benefit design.药品支出趋势:对药品福利设计的影响。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2008 May;1(4):29-34.
9
How patient cost-sharing trends affect adherence and outcomes: a literature review.患者费用分担趋势如何影响依从性和治疗结果:一项文献综述。
P T. 2012 Jan;37(1):45-55.
10
How do quality information and cost affect patient choice of provider in a tiered network setting? Results from a survey.在分层网络环境中,质量信息和成本如何影响患者对提供者的选择?一项调查的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Apr;46(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01217.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.