• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化

Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.

作者信息

Landon Bruce E, Rosenthal Meredith B, Normand Sharon-Lise T, Spettell Claire, Lessler Adam, Underwood Howard R, Newhouse Joseph P

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.

PMID:17567237
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of incentive formularies on prescription drug spending shifts in formulary compliance, use of generic medications, and mail-order fulfillment in the year after introduction of a new pharmacy benefit strategy.

STUDY DESIGN

Pre-post comparison study with matched concurrent control group (difference-indifferences analysis).

METHODS

Study subjects were continuously enrolled patients from a single large health plan in the northeastern United States. Health plan administrative data were used to determine the total, health plan, and out-of-pocket spending in the year before and the year after the introduction of 12 different benefit changes, including 1 in which copayments decreased.

RESULTS

Overall, changing from a single-tier or 2-tier formulary to a 3-tier formulary was associated with a decrease in total drug spending of about 5% to 15%. Plan spending decreased more dramatically, about 20%, whereas out-of-pocket spending that resulted from higher copayments increased between 20% and >100%. Changing to an incentive formulary with higher copayments was accompanied by a small but inconsistent decrease in use of nonformulary selections and a concomitant increase in both generic and formulary preferred utilization. Mail-order fulfillment doubled, albeit from a low baseline level.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to incentive formulary arrangements with higher levels of copayments generally led to overall lower drug costs and vice versa. These effects varied with the degree of change, level of baseline spending, and magnitude of the copayments. Whether these effects are beneficial overall depends on potential health effects and spillover effects on medical spending.

摘要

目的

研究在引入新的药房福利策略后的一年中,激励性药品目录对处方药物支出转移、药品目录合规性、通用药物使用以及邮购执行情况的影响。

研究设计

采用匹配同期对照组的前后比较研究(差异-差异分析)。

方法

研究对象为美国东北部一个大型健康计划中的持续参保患者。利用健康计划管理数据来确定在引入12种不同福利变更(包括1种共付额降低的变更)之前和之后一年的总支出、健康计划支出和自付支出。

结果

总体而言,从单层或两层药品目录转变为三层药品目录与药品总支出降低约5%至15%相关。计划支出下降更为显著,约为20%,而因共付额增加导致的自付支出增加了20%至超过100%。转向共付额更高的激励性药品目录伴随着非目录药品选择使用量的小幅但不一致的下降,以及通用药物和目录优先药物使用量的相应增加。邮购执行量翻倍,尽管起始水平较低。

结论

转向共付额更高的激励性药品目录安排通常会导致总体药品成本降低,反之亦然。这些影响因变更程度、基线支出水平和共付额幅度而异。这些影响总体上是否有益取决于对健康的潜在影响以及对医疗支出的溢出效应。

相似文献

1
Incentive formularies and changes in prescription drug spending.激励性药品目录与处方药支出的变化
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):360-9.
2
The effect of incentive-based formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending.基于激励措施的药品处方集对处方药使用及支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2224-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030954.
3
Consumer response to dual incentives under multitiered prescription drug formularies.消费者对多层级处方药处方集下双重激励措施的反应。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):353-9.
4
Relationship between generic and preferred-brand prescription copayment differentials and generic fill rate.普通品牌与首选品牌处方药共付差异与普通药品填充率之间的关系。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):347-52.
5
Consumer attitudes and factors related to prescription switching decisions in multitier copayment drug benefit plans.多层共付药品福利计划中消费者态度及与处方转换决策相关的因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Mar;10(3):201-8.
6
Impact of 3-tier formularies on drug treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.三层药品目录对儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍药物治疗的影响。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Apr;62(4):435-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.435.
7
Impact of patient and plan design factors on switching to preferred statin therapy.患者及方案设计因素对改用首选他汀类药物治疗的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;41(12):1946-53. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K253. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
8
Controlling prescription drug expenditures: a report of success.控制处方药支出:一份成功报告。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Aug;13(8):473-80.
9
Effect of a medication copayment increase in veterans with schizophrenia.增加药物自付费用对退伍军人精神分裂症患者的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):335-46.
10
Effect of copayments on drug use in the presence of annual payment limits.在存在年度支付限额的情况下,共付额对药物使用的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Pt 2):328-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Cost Sharing on Therapeutic Substitution: The Story of Statins in 2006.费用分担对治疗替代的影响:2006年他汀类药物的情况
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Nov 11;5(11):e003377. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003377.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
3
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
4
Is the US "leading from behind" on health policy?美国在卫生政策上是“幕后主导”吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;15(2):113-6. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0548-2. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
5
Comparison of tiered formularies and reference pricing policies: a systematic review.分层处方集与参考定价政策的比较:一项系统综述。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e131-9. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
6
Systematic review on quality control for drug management programs: is quality reported in the literature?药物管理项目质量控制的系统评价:文献中是否报道了质量情况?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb 25;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-38.
7
Impact of pharmacy benefit design on prescription drug utilization: a fixed effects analysis of plan sponsor data.药学福利设计对处方药使用的影响:对计划赞助商数据的固定效应分析
Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):988-1009. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00943.x. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
8
Out-of-pocket payments in arthritis: spur to prudent purchasing or red herring?关节炎的自付费用:是促使谨慎购买的因素还是误导因素?
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Aug;58(8):2225-7. doi: 10.1002/art.23724.