Laskin Daniel M, Lesny Robert J, Best Al M
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Feb;61(2):228-33. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50032.
The purpose of this study was to determine the factors considered by oral and maxillofacial surgery residents in selecting residency programs, to estimate the level of their satisfaction with the selection and matching processes, and to analyze the relationship between these factors and overall satisfaction with their match.
A questionnaire was sent to 675 residents listed as members of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and 208 responded to the survey. Of these residents, 56.7% were in an MD integrated program, 30.3% were in a 4-year certificate program, 10.6% were in an MD optional program, and 2.4% were in a combined PhD program.
There were no differences between the program types and the number of resident applications or the number of interviews. Residents in the MD integrated programs had significantly higher board scores than both the MD optional residents and the 4-year certificate residents. The most important factors that residents considered when making their match list were as follows: good relationships between residents, good relationships between residents and attendings, training in orthognathic surgery, training in implant surgery, and training in dentoalveolar surgery. When residents were asked whether they were satisfied with the program in which they were currently enrolled, MD integrated residents were significantly more satisfied than were those residents in the MD optional and 4-year certificate program. Additional predictors of residence satisfaction were satisfied with the results of the match process, accuracy of the program in representing itself during the interview process, and less importance placed on orthognathic surgery training. Although generally satisfied, 25% would want to go to a different program if they could go through the match again.
The majority of residents seem to be satisfied with the program in which they matched. Among the important factors determining satisfaction are the degree of honesty during the interview process, good relations among residents and between residents and attending doctors, the scope of clinical training, and the didactic/academic content of the program.
本研究旨在确定口腔颌面外科住院医师在选择住院医师培训项目时所考虑的因素,评估他们对选拔和匹配过程的满意度水平,并分析这些因素与对匹配结果的总体满意度之间的关系。
向列为美国口腔颌面外科医师协会成员的675名住院医师发送了问卷,208名住院医师回复了调查。在这些住院医师中,56.7%参加医学博士综合项目,30.3%参加4年制证书项目,10.6%参加医学博士选修项目,2.4%参加博士联合项目。
项目类型与住院医师申请数量或面试数量之间没有差异。医学博士综合项目的住院医师在委员会考试中的得分显著高于医学博士选修项目的住院医师和4年制证书项目的住院医师。住院医师在制定匹配名单时考虑的最重要因素如下:住院医师之间的良好关系、住院医师与带教老师之间的良好关系、正颌外科培训、种植外科培训和牙槽外科培训。当被问及是否对目前就读的项目满意时,医学博士综合项目的住院医师比医学博士选修项目和4年制证书项目的住院医师满意度显著更高。住院医师满意度的其他预测因素包括对匹配过程结果的满意、项目在面试过程中自我展示的准确性以及对正颌外科培训的重视程度较低。尽管总体上感到满意,但如果可以再次进行匹配,25%的人希望去不同的项目。
大多数住院医师似乎对他们所匹配的项目感到满意。决定满意度的重要因素包括面试过程中的诚实程度、住院医师之间以及住院医师与带教医生之间的良好关系、临床培训范围以及项目的教学/学术内容。