Rortveit Guri, Daltveit Anne Kjersti, Hannestad Yngvild S, Hunskaar Steinar
Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag study, Bergen, Norway.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):900-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021788.
It is uncertain whether women who deliver by cesarean section have an increased risk of urinary incontinence as compared with nulliparous women and whether women who deliver vaginally have an even higher risk.
We studied 15,307 women enrolled in the Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag (EPINCONT) study, which involved a community-based cohort. The data base for this study was linked to data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. We included women who answered questions related to urinary incontinence, were younger than 65 years of age, and had had no deliveries, cesarean sections only, or vaginal deliveries only.
The prevalence of any incontinence was 10.1 percent in the nulliparous group; age-standardized prevalences were 15.9 percent in the cesarean-section group and 21.0 percent in the vaginal-delivery group. Corresponding figures for moderate or severe incontinence were 3.7 percent, 6.2 percent, and 8.7 percent, respectively; figures for stress incontinence were 4.7 percent, 6.9 percent, and 12.2 percent, respectively; figures for urge incontinence were 1.6 percent, 2.2 percent, and 1.8 percent, respectively; and figures for mixed-type incontinence were 3.1 percent, 5.3 percent, and 6.1 percent, respectively. As compared with nulliparous women, women who had cesarean sections had an adjusted odds ratio for any incontinence of 1.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.9) and an adjusted odds ratio for moderate or severe incontinence of 1.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.1). Only stress and mixed-type incontinence were significantly associated with cesarean sections. The adjusted odds ratio for any incontinence associated with vaginal deliveries as compared with cesarean sections was 1.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.1), and the adjusted odds ratio for moderate or severe incontinence was 2.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.1). Only stress incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 3.2) was associated with the mode of delivery.
The risk of urinary incontinence is higher among women who have had cesarean sections than among nulliparous women and is even higher among women who have had vaginal deliveries. However, these findings should not be used to justify an increase in the use of cesarean sections.
与未生育的女性相比,剖宫产分娩的女性尿失禁风险是否增加尚不确定,以及经阴道分娩的女性风险是否更高也不明确。
我们研究了纳入北特伦德拉格郡尿失禁流行病学(EPINCONT)研究的15307名女性,该研究涉及一个基于社区的队列。本研究的数据库与挪威医疗出生登记处的数据相关联。我们纳入了回答了与尿失禁相关问题、年龄小于65岁且未生育、仅行剖宫产或仅经阴道分娩的女性。
未生育组中任何类型尿失禁的患病率为10.1%;剖宫产组年龄标准化患病率为15.9%,经阴道分娩组为21.0%。中度或重度尿失禁的相应数字分别为3.7%、6.2%和8.7%;压力性尿失禁的数字分别为4.7%、6.9%和12.2%;急迫性尿失禁的数字分别为1.6%、2.2%和1.8%;混合型尿失禁的数字分别为3.1%、5.3%和6.1%。与未生育女性相比,剖宫产女性任何类型尿失禁的调整优势比为1.5(95%置信区间为1.2至1.9),中度或重度尿失禁的调整优势比为1.4(95%置信区间为1.0至2.1)。只有压力性和混合型尿失禁与剖宫产显著相关。与剖宫产相比,经阴道分娩相关的任何类型尿失禁的调整优势比为1.7(95%置信区间为1.3至2.1),中度或重度尿失禁的调整优势比为2.2(95%置信区间为1.5至3.1)。只有压力性尿失禁(调整优势比为2.4;95%置信区间为1.7至3.2)与分娩方式相关。
剖宫产女性尿失禁的风险高于未生育女性,经阴道分娩的女性风险更高。然而,这些发现不应被用于支持增加剖宫产的使用。