Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice.
作者信息
Violato Claudio, Lockyer Jocelyn, Fidler Herta
机构信息
Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
出版信息
BMJ. 2003 Mar 8;326(7388):546-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.546.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice.多源反馈：一种评估外科手术实践的方法。
BMJ. 2003 Mar 8;326(7388):546-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.546.
2
Multisource feedback to assess surgical practice: a systematic review.多源反馈评估外科实践：系统评价。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;70(4):475-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
3
Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.多源反馈问卷在评估和再认证中的应用：英国普通实践中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 May;62(598):e314-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X641429.
4
Assessing professionalism in surgeons.评估外科医生的专业精神。
Surgeon. 2010 Feb;8(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2009.10.008.
5
Revalidation, appraisal and multisource feedback for occupational physicians.职业医师的再认证、评估与多源反馈
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Aug 1;67(6):413-415. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx062.
6
Surgeons top the number of referrals to assessment authority.外科医生被转介至评估机构的人数最多。
BMJ. 2002 Aug 3;325(7358):235. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7358.235.
7
The Role of Crowdsourcing in Assessing Surgical Skills.众包在评估手术技能中的作用。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Aug;26(4):271-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000293.
8
Assessment of surgical competence.手术能力评估。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii64-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100064...
9
Does multisource feedback influence performance appraisal satisfaction?
Nurs Manage. 2011 Mar;42(3):12-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000394060.41121.ce.
10
Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review.影响多源反馈在改善医生专业实践效果的因素：系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Apr 11;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-76.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparing surgeon perception to publicly reported data using NSQIP.使用美国国立外科手术质量改进计划（NSQIP）将外科医生的认知与公开报告的数据进行比较。
J Orthop. 2023 Jun 26;42:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.06.010. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Basic principles of cardiothoracic surgery training: a position paper by the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Residents Committee.心胸外科培训的基本原则：欧洲心胸外科住院医师委员会的立场文件。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Sep 9;35(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac213.
3
Assessing anaesthesiology and intensive care specialty physicians: An Italian language multisource feedback system.评估麻醉学和重症监护专科医师：一种意大利语多源反馈系统。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0250404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250404. eCollection 2021.
4
Professionalism and inter-communication skills (ICS): a multi-site validity study assessing proficiency in core competencies and milestones in medical learners.专业精神与人际沟通技能（ICS）：一项多中心效度研究，评估医学学习者核心能力和里程碑的熟练程度。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02290-3.
5
A german-language competency-based multisource feedback instrument for residents: development and validity evidence.一种用于住院医师的基于德语能力的多源反馈工具：开发与效度证据
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02259-2.
6
Survey of physician attitudes to using multisource feedback for competence assessment in Alberta.阿尔伯塔省医生对使用多源反馈进行能力评估的态度调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e037610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037610.
7
Picking the Right Tool for the Job: A Reliability Study of 4 Assessment Tools for Central Venous Catheter Insertion.为这项工作挑选合适的工具：四种中心静脉导管插入术评估工具的可靠性研究。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4):422-429. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00107.1.
8
Evaluation of inter-professional communication and leadership skills among graduating Canadian urology residents.对即将毕业的加拿大泌尿外科住院医师的跨专业沟通与领导技能的评估。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Sep;13(9):E258-E262. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5643.
9
Patient and public involvement in medical performance processes: A systematic review.患者和公众参与医疗绩效流程：系统评价。
Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):149-161. doi: 10.1111/hex.12852. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
The mini-PAT as a multi-source feedback tool for trainees in child and adolescent psychiatry: assessing whether it is fit for purpose.作为儿童和青少年精神病学培训学员多源反馈工具的迷你患者评估工具（mini-PAT）：评估其是否适用。
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Apr;41(2):115-119. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.052720.
本文引用的文献
1
The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification.患者和同行评级在再认证中的价值。
Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S64-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210001-00021.
2
3
Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter.新千年的医学职业精神：一份医师宪章
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Feb 5;136(3):243-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00012.
4
Defining and assessing professional competence.界定与评估专业能力。
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):226-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
5
Setting performance standards for medical practice: a theoretical framework.
Med Educ. 2001 May;35(5):474-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00897.x.
6
Educating future physicians for Ontario: phase II.
Acad Med. 2000 Feb;75(2):113-26. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00005.
7
Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.艾伯塔省医生绩效评估：医生成就审查
CMAJ. 1999 Jul 13;161(1):52-7.
8
Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback.改变医生的行为：个人反馈的作用。
Acad Med. 1999 Jun;74(6):702-14. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199906000-00019.
9
An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study.澳大利亚医疗保健质量研究中不良事件原因分析。
Med J Aust. 1999 May 3;170(9):411-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb127814.x.
10
Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians.利用同行、会诊医生、同事和患者来评估医生的可行性及心理测量特性。
Acad Med. 1997 Oct;72(10 Suppl 1):S82-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199710001-00028.
Zotero 插件