Grassi Guido, Seravalle Gino, Turri Carlo, Bolla GianBattista, Mancia Giuseppe
Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica, Prevenzione e Biotecnologie Sanitarie, Università Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Milano, Italy.
Hypertension. 2003 Mar;41(3):558-62. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000058003.27729.5A. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
Antihypertensive treatment with dihydropyridines may be accompanied by sympathetic activation. Data on whether this is common to all compounds and similar in the various phases of treatment are not univocal, however. In 28 untreated essential hypertensives (age, 56.4+/-1.8 years; mean+/-SEM) finger blood pressure (BP, Finapres), heart rate (HR, ECG), plasma norepinephrine (NE, high-performance liquid chromatography), and muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA, microneurography) were measured at rest and during baroreceptor manipulation (vasoactive drugs) in the placebo run-in period and after randomization to double-blind acute and chronic (8 weeks) felodipine (10 mg/d, n=14) or lercanidipine (10 mg/d, n=14). Acute administration of both drugs induced pronounced BP reductions and marked increases in HR, NE, and MSNA. After 8 weeks of treatment, BP reductions were similar to those observed after acute administration, whereas HR, NE, and MSNA responses were markedly attenuated (-7%, -32%, and -14%, respectively; P<0.05). There was a small residual increase in sympathetic activity in the felodipine group, whereas in the lercanidipine group, all adrenergic markers returned to baseline values. Baroreflex control of HR and MSNA was markedly impaired (-42% and -48%, respectively) after acute drug administration, with a recovery and complete resetting during chronic treatment. Thus, the sympathoexcitation induced by 2 different dihydropyridines is largely limited to the acute administration. The 2 drugs have, nevertheless, a different chronic sympathetic effect, indicating that dihydropyridines do not homogeneously affect this function. The acute sympathoexcitation, but not the small between-drugs differential chronic adrenergic effect, is accounted for by baroreflex impairment.
使用二氢吡啶类药物进行抗高血压治疗可能会伴有交感神经激活。然而,关于这是否在所有化合物中都常见以及在治疗的各个阶段是否相似的数据并不明确。在28例未经治疗的原发性高血压患者(年龄56.4±1.8岁;平均值±标准误)中,在安慰剂导入期以及随机分为双盲急性和慢性(8周)非洛地平(10mg/d,n = 14)或乐卡地平(10mg/d,n = 14)治疗后,测量静息时以及压力感受器操作(血管活性药物)期间的手指血压(BP,Finapres)、心率(HR,心电图)、血浆去甲肾上腺素(NE,高效液相色谱法)和肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA,微神经ography)。两种药物的急性给药均导致明显的血压降低以及心率、NE和MSNA的显著增加。治疗8周后,血压降低与急性给药后观察到的相似,而心率、NE和MSNA反应明显减弱(分别为-7%、-32%和-14%;P<0.05)。非洛地平组交感神经活动有少量残余增加,而在乐卡地平组中,所有肾上腺素能标志物均恢复至基线值。急性给药后,心率和MSNA的压力反射控制明显受损(分别为-42%和-48%),在慢性治疗期间恢复并完全重置。因此,两种不同的二氢吡啶类药物引起的交感神经兴奋在很大程度上仅限于急性给药。然而,这两种药物具有不同的慢性交感神经效应,表明二氢吡啶类药物对该功能的影响并不均匀。急性交感神经兴奋是由压力反射受损引起的,而药物间慢性肾上腺素能效应的微小差异并非如此。