Suppr超能文献

简化版与标准版明尼苏达多项人格测验鉴别诊断能力的比较。

Comparison of differential diagnostic discrimination for abbreviated and standard MMPI.

作者信息

Overall J E, Higgins W, De Schweinitz A

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1976 Apr;32(2):237-45. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<237::aid-jclp2270320208>3.0.co;2-9.

Abstract

MMPI response protocols for 194 psychiatric patients were scored on the basis of the first 168 items and then on the usual 400 items. The MMPI-168 raw scores were converted to estimates of conventional clinical scale scores. The Ss were divided into 10 major categories on the basis of final clinical diagnosis. Multiple discriminant analysis was used to compare the discriminant validity of the abbreviated and standard scoring. The results indicated no loss in discrimination to result from scoring based on only the first 168 items. Conversion tables that can be used to transform MMPI-168 raw scores to standard MMPI clinical scale scores are presented for further research and clinical use.

摘要

根据前168项对194名精神病患者的明尼苏达多项人格测验(MMPI)反应模式进行评分,然后再根据通常的400项进行评分。将MMPI - 168的原始分数转换为传统临床量表分数的估计值。根据最终临床诊断将研究对象分为10个主要类别。采用多元判别分析比较简缩评分和标准评分的判别效度。结果表明,仅基于前168项进行评分不会导致判别力的损失。本文给出了可用于将MMPI - 168原始分数转换为标准MMPI临床量表分数的转换表,以供进一步研究和临床使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验