Suppr超能文献

中重度阿尔茨海默病患者使用美金刚的资源利用及成本分析。

Resource utilisation and cost analysis of memantine in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Wimo Anders, Winblad Bengt, Stöffler Albrecht, Wirth Yvonne, Möbius Hans-Jörg

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Epidemiology (Sector of Health Economy), Neurotec, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(5):327-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321050-00004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a devastating illness that causes enormous emotional stress to affected families and is associated with substantial medical and nonmedical costs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of 28 weeks of memantine treatment for patients with AD on resource utilisation and costs.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Multicentre, prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial performed in the US. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to examine the resource utilisation variables and logistic regression models were used for multivariate resource utilisation analyses. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models (log and non-log) were computed to examine costs from a societal perspective. All costs were calculated in 1999 US dollars.

STUDY POPULATION

Outpatients with moderate to severe AD. Overall, 252 patients received randomised treatment, and 166 patients (placebo n = 76, memantine n = 90) formed the treated-per-protocol (TPP) subset for the health economic analyses, on which the main cost analysis was based.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Resource Utilisation in Dementia (RUD) scale, measuring patient and caregiver resource utilisation, and various sources for cost calculations.

RESULTS

Controlling for baseline differences between the groups, significantly less caregiver time was needed for patients receiving memantine than for those receiving placebo (difference 51.5 hours per month; 95% CI -95.27, -7.17; p = 0.02). Analysis of residential status also favoured memantine: time to institutionalisation (p = 0.052) and institutionalisation at week 28 (p = 0.04 with the chi-square test). Total costs from a societal perspective were lower in the memantine group (difference dollars US 1089.74/month [non-overlapping 95% CI for treatment difference -1954.90, -224.58]; p = 0.01). The main differences between the groups were total caregiver costs (dollars US-823.77/month; p = 0.03) and direct nonmedical costs (dollars US-430.84/month; p = 0.07) favouring memantine treatment. Patient direct medical costs were higher in the memantine group (p < 0.01), mainly due to the cost of memantine.

CONCLUSION

Resource utilisation and total health costs were lower in the memantine group than the placebo group. The results suggest that memantine treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD is cost saving from a societal perspective.

摘要

背景

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种具有毁灭性的疾病,给受影响的家庭带来巨大的情感压力,并伴随着高昂的医疗和非医疗费用。

目的

确定美金刚治疗AD患者28周对资源利用和成本的影响。

研究设计与方法

在美国进行的多中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验来检查资源利用变量,并使用逻辑回归模型进行多变量资源利用分析。计算协方差分析(ANCOVA)模型(对数和非对数)以从社会角度检查成本。所有成本均以1999年美元计算。

研究人群

中重度AD门诊患者。总体而言,252名患者接受了随机治疗,166名患者(安慰剂组n = 76,美金刚组n = 90)构成了健康经济分析的符合方案治疗(TPP)子集,主要成本分析基于该子集。

主要观察指标

痴呆症资源利用(RUD)量表,用于衡量患者和照顾者的资源利用情况,以及各种成本计算来源。

结果

在控制组间基线差异后,接受美金刚治疗的患者所需照顾者时间明显少于接受安慰剂治疗的患者(差异为每月51.5小时;95%可信区间-95.27,-7.17;p = 0.02)。对居住状况的分析也有利于美金刚:入住机构的时间(p = 0.052)和第28周时入住机构的情况(卡方检验p = 0.04)。从社会角度来看,美金刚组的总成本较低(差异为每月1089.74美元[治疗差异的非重叠性95%可信区间-1954.90,-224.58];p = 0.01)。两组之间的主要差异在于照顾者总成本(每月-823.77美元;p = 0.03)和直接非医疗成本(每月-430.84美元;p = 0.07)有利于美金刚治疗。美金刚组患者直接医疗成本较高(p < 0.01),主要是由于美金刚的成本。

结论

美金刚组的资源利用和总医疗成本低于安慰剂组。结果表明,从中度至重度AD患者的社会角度来看美金刚治疗具有成本节约作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验