Arrindell W A, de Vlaming Irene H, Eisenhardt Beatrix M, van Berkum Donja E, Kwee M G T
Department of Clinical Psychology, Heymans Institute, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/I, 9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2002 Sep-Dec;33(3-4):159-76. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7916(02)00047-2.
Some psychometric properties of an adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale for use in the Netherlands (Y-BOCS-NL) were examined in 65 psychiatric inpatients. The factorial invariance of two-dimensional systems were determined, namely Severity and Disturbance versus Obsessions and Compulsions, with the latter performing substantially better than the former in different respects. All further analyses were therefore focused on the Obsessions and Compulsions prototype. Inter-rater agreement was established in four inpatients by 39 raters at different institutions and found to be excellent. Internal consistency was also excellent. Concurrent and divergent validity were examined and established by correlating the Y-BOCS-NL with the Padua Inventory, the Burns Perfectionism Scale and state and/or trait measures of, among others, hostility, anxiety, depression, irrational fears and assertiveness. The Obsessions and Compulsions dimensions were lowly intercorrelated and showed evidence of clearly different patterns of correlations with external measures (divergent validity).
在65名精神科住院患者中,对荷兰版耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS-NL)改编版的一些心理测量学特性进行了检验。确定了二维系统的因素不变性,即严重程度和干扰程度与强迫观念和强迫行为,后者在不同方面的表现明显优于前者。因此,所有进一步的分析都集中在强迫观念和强迫行为原型上。39名来自不同机构的评估者对4名住院患者进行了评估,结果显示评估者间信度极佳。内部一致性也极佳。通过将Y-BOCS-NL与帕多瓦量表、伯恩斯完美主义量表以及敌意、焦虑、抑郁、非理性恐惧和自信等状态和/或特质测量指标进行相关分析,检验并确立了同时效度和区分效度。强迫观念和强迫行为维度之间的相关性较低,并且显示出与外部测量指标的相关性模式明显不同的证据(区分效度)。