Sarmiento Juan M, Sarr Michael G
Division of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW (AL 2-435), Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003 Apr;5(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s11894-003-0080-0.
Pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal disease in spite of new developments in early diagnosis, marked improvements in surgical morbidity and mortality, and introduction of promising adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. This ongoing poor prognosis can be explained in part by the relatively advanced stage of these malignancies at the time of presentation and diagnosis. The staging process in this disease lacks standardization and differs considerably from center to center. Acknowledging that it is impossible to achieve a perfect workup to rule out micrometastatic disease, controversy persists regarding the optimal initial approach and subsequent staging of these tumors. A better, or at least a more standardized staging system, should help to improve disappointing results in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, although such an improvement will be based more on the selection of patients than the actual therapeutic intervention. This paper addresses the current controversy in staging methodology for pancreatic and periampullary malignancies and offers an approach to the staging of pancreatic cancer.
尽管在早期诊断方面有新进展、手术发病率和死亡率有显著改善,以及引入了有前景的辅助和新辅助治疗方法,但胰腺癌仍然是一种高度致命的疾病。这些恶性肿瘤在出现和诊断时相对较晚期,这在一定程度上解释了其持续不佳的预后。该疾病的分期过程缺乏标准化,不同中心之间差异很大。认识到不可能实现完美的检查以排除微转移疾病,关于这些肿瘤的最佳初始方法和后续分期仍存在争议。一个更好的、或者至少更标准化的分期系统,应该有助于改善胰腺癌手术治疗令人失望的结果,尽管这种改善更多地将基于患者的选择而非实际的治疗干预。本文探讨了胰腺和壶腹周围恶性肿瘤分期方法的当前争议,并提供了一种胰腺癌分期方法。