Suppr超能文献

全科医生与针对残疾人的社会救助

General practitioners and social help for the handicapped.

作者信息

Firth B

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Jan;25(150):21-6.

Abstract

A study was undertaken by the Greater London Association for the Disabled in consultation with the Royal College of General Practitioners, to explore the depth of knowledge of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act and statutory and voluntary social provision, of 22 general practitioners in 16 practices served by one area social services office in a London borough.The doctors were mainly middle-aged, of British or Irish birth and training and had no language barrier. The majority lived in or near their practices. Half the practices were groups or partnerships, half were singlehanded. Only in three groups was there any attached district nursing staff and in only one was there an attached health visitor. More than half the general practitioners had reception staff only during surgery hours. Four practices had no reception staff during National Health Service surgery hours, two of which had no reception staff at all. In no practice was there any privately employed nursing staff. All the practices had private patients.Nine of the 22 doctors in the study had never heard of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act, and a further five had not mentioned the Act to their patients. Fifty per cent had no knowledge of the extent of functional disability in their practice. More than half the doctors knew no more of the social services than that home helps and meals-on-wheels were available, while six doctors knew of no provision at all. Knowledge and use of the voluntary services was almost non-existent. No meetings with team members were held, other than in the group practices with attached staff, and the team members were largely unknown to most of the doctors.Attempts were made through various channels to extend the knowledge of the general practitioners of the services provided by both statutory and voluntary agencies, and to introduce them and their receptionists to their team, but little use was made of the opportunity.

摘要

大伦敦残疾人协会与皇家全科医师学院协商开展了一项研究,以探究伦敦一个行政区内由一个地区社会服务办公室提供服务的16家诊所中22名全科医生对《慢性病患者及残疾人法案》以及法定和志愿性社会福利的了解程度。这些医生主要为中年,出生于英国或爱尔兰,接受过相关培训,不存在语言障碍。他们大多居住在诊所附近或诊所内。一半的诊所是合伙经营或团体执业,另一半是个体执业。只有三家团体诊所配有地区护理人员,只有一家配有健康访视员。超过一半的全科医生只有在诊疗时间才有接待员。有四家诊所在国民医疗服务体系诊疗时间没有接待员,其中两家根本没有接待员。没有一家诊所有私人雇佣的护理人员。所有诊所都有私人患者。参与研究的22名医生中有9名从未听说过《慢性病患者及残疾人法案》,另有5名从未向患者提及该法案。50%的医生不清楚自己诊所中功能残疾患者的情况。超过一半的医生对社会福利的了解仅限于知道有上门护理服务和送餐服务,而有6名医生对任何福利都一无所知。对志愿性服务的了解和使用几乎不存在。除了配有工作人员的团体诊所外,没有与团队成员举行过会议,而且大多数医生对团队成员基本不了解。通过各种渠道试图让全科医生了解法定和志愿机构提供的服务,并将他们及其接待员介绍给团队,但几乎没有利用这个机会。

相似文献

6
Disability as identified from general practice records.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jan 26;290(6464):287-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6464.287.

引用本文的文献

1
Disabled living centres.残疾人士生活中心
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Jan;38(306):34-5.

本文引用的文献

2
Prospects for social work in general practice.
Lancet. 1970 Sep 12;2(7672):559-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)91360-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验