• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医疗补助计划中药物滥用的医疗补助受益人的医保计划选择情况。

Evaluating selection out of health plans for Medicaid beneficiaries with substance abuse.

作者信息

Normand Sharon-Lise T, Belanger Albert J, Frank Richard G

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):78-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02287814.

DOI:10.1007/BF02287814
PMID:12633005
Abstract

In the absence of adequate risk adjustment, capitation for enrollees creates incentives for health plans to enroll and retain good risks and to avoid bad risks. This article examines whether Maryland Medicaid beneficiaries with histories of substance abuse disenroll from health plans more frequently than those without such histories. The findings indicate that enrollees with a history of substance abuse were more likely to switch plans than other enrollees, regardless of whether they chose the health plan or were randomly assigned to the plan. These results suggest that current risk-adjustment systems may fail to offset selection incentives in modern capitated health plans.

摘要

在缺乏充分风险调整的情况下,为参保人提供按人头付费会促使健康保险计划去招募并留住健康风险低的人群,同时规避健康风险高的人群。本文研究了有药物滥用史的马里兰州医疗补助受益人是否比没有此类病史的受益人更频繁地退出健康保险计划。研究结果表明,有药物滥用史的参保人比其他参保人更有可能更换保险计划,无论他们是自行选择该健康保险计划还是被随机分配到该计划。这些结果表明,当前的风险调整系统可能无法抵消现代按人头付费健康保险计划中的选择激励因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluating selection out of health plans for Medicaid beneficiaries with substance abuse.评估医疗补助计划中药物滥用的医疗补助受益人的医保计划选择情况。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):78-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02287814.
2
Do adjusted clinical groups eliminate incentives for HMOs to avoid substance abusers? Evidence from the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program.调整后的临床分组能否消除健康维护组织(HMO)规避药物滥用者的动机?来自马里兰州医疗补助健康选择计划的证据。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):63-77. doi: 10.1007/BF02287813.
3
Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.医疗补助计划下行为健康护理付费中的风险调整替代方案。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;36(4):793-811.
4
Comorbidity-based payment methodology for Medicaid enrollees with HIV/AIDS.针对患有艾滋病毒/艾滋病的医疗补助计划参保人的基于合并症的支付方法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Winter;23(2):53-68.
5
The development of a risk-adjusted capitation payment system: the Maryland Medicaid model.风险调整后的按人头付费系统的发展:马里兰州医疗补助模式
J Ambul Care Manage. 1998 Oct;21(4):29-52. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199810000-00003.
6
Outcomes for medicaid clients with substance abuse problems before and after managed care.医疗补助计划中患有药物滥用问题的客户在管理式医疗前后的结果。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;32(4):351-67. doi: 10.1007/BF02384196.
7
Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.衡量管理式医疗保健中的逆向选择。
J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):829-54. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00059-x.
8
The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's HealthChoice program.管理式医疗对医疗补助受益人的药物滥用治疗模式及治疗效果的影响:马里兰州的健康选择计划
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):41-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02287812.
9
Is conventional wisdom wrong? Coverage for substance abuse treatment under Medicaid managed care.传统观念是否有误?医疗补助管理式医疗下的药物滥用治疗覆盖范围。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Jun;30(4):285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.12.006.
10
Effect of managed care on access to mental health services among Medicaid enrollees receiving substance treatment.管理式医疗对接受药物治疗的医疗补助计划参保者获得心理健康服务的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Jul;55(7):775-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.7.775.

引用本文的文献

1
State substance abuse and mental health managed care evaluation program.州药物滥用和心理健康管理式医疗评估项目
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/BF02287809.

本文引用的文献

1
Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.关于相关比例或百分比差异的抽样误差说明。
Psychometrika. 1947 Jun;12(2):153-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02295996.
2
A test for symmetry in contingency tables.列联表对称性检验。
J Am Stat Assoc. 1948 Dec;43(244):572-4. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1948.10483284.
3
Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.医疗补助计划下行为健康护理付费中的风险调整替代方案。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;36(4):793-811.
4
Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.衡量管理式医疗保健中的逆向选择。
J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):829-54. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00059-x.
5
How expensive are unlimited substance abuse benefits under managed care?管理式医疗下的无限药物滥用福利有多昂贵?
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999 May;26(2):203-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02287491.
6
Risk adjustment: where are we now?风险调整:我们目前处于什么状况?
Inquiry. 1998 Summer;35(2):122-31.
7
The collision of economics and politics in Medicaid managed care: reflections on the course of reform in Maryland.医疗补助管理式医疗中的经济与政治碰撞:对马里兰州改革历程的思考
Milbank Q. 1998;76(1):59-101. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00079.
8
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
9
Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.一种以人群为导向的门诊护理病例组合测量方法的开发与应用。
Med Care. 1991 May;29(5):452-72. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199105000-00006.