• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险调整:我们目前处于什么状况?

Risk adjustment: where are we now?

作者信息

Newhouse J P

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1998 Summer;35(2):122-31.

PMID:9719781
Abstract

Risk adjustment is intended to minimize selection of patients or enrollees in health plans. Current efforts generally are recognized as inadequate, but improvement is difficult. The greatest short-term gain will come from introducing diagnostic information, though outpatient diagnosis data are unreliable. Initial efforts may use inpatient data, but this creates incentives to hospitalize people. Even exploiting diagnosis information leaves substantial imperfections. Partial capitation, common in behavioral health, reduces incentives to select patients and stent on services, but current policy resists it, perhaps because policymakers misinterpret the lesson of the Prospective Payment System. Theoretically, not paying plans more for providing additional services is optimal only if consumers are well informed.

摘要

风险调整旨在尽量减少健康计划中患者或参保人的选择。目前的努力普遍被认为是不够的,但改进却很困难。最大的短期收益将来自引入诊断信息,尽管门诊诊断数据不可靠。初步努力可能会使用住院数据,但这会产生让人住院的动机。即使利用诊断信息也存在很大缺陷。行为健康领域常见的部分人头付费制减少了选择患者和过度提供服务的动机,但当前政策对此持抵制态度,这可能是因为政策制定者误解了前瞻性支付系统的教训。从理论上讲,只有当消费者充分了解情况时,不为提供额外服务的计划支付更多费用才是最优的。

相似文献

1
Risk adjustment: where are we now?风险调整:我们目前处于什么状况?
Inquiry. 1998 Summer;35(2):122-31.
2
Policy implications of risk selection in Medicare HMOs: is the federal payment rate too high?医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)中风险选择的政策影响:联邦支付率是否过高?
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 1996 Nov(4):1-7.
3
Prepare now by learning the ABCs of PIP-DCGs (principal inpatient diagnostic cost groups).现在通过学习主要住院诊断成本组(PIP-DCGs)的基础知识来做好准备。
Public Sect Contract Rep. 1998 Jun;4(6):86-7.
4
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医院 inpatient 预期支付系统及 2007 财年费率的变更;2007 财年工资指数的职业构成调整;医疗保健基础设施改善计划;参与癌症相关医疗保健的合格医院贷款计划的选择标准及债务免除;以及在计算平均销售价格(ASP)时排除根据 B 部分门诊药品和生物制品的竞争性采购计划(CAP)进行的供应商采购。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Aug 18;71(160):47869-8351.
5
Can managed care save Medicare? Achieving high quality and low costs through managed care.管理式医疗能拯救医疗保险吗?通过管理式医疗实现高质量与低成本。
Manag Care Q. 1996 Autumn;4(4):12-29.
6
Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.医疗补助计划下行为健康护理付费中的风险调整替代方案。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;36(4):793-811.
7
Biased enrollment of Medicare beneficiaries in HMO plans--implications for Medicare costs.医疗保险受益人在健康维护组织(HMO)计划中的偏向性参保情况——对医疗保险成本的影响。
J Health Care Finance. 2002 Summer;28(4):43-57.
8
New capitation scenarios for HMO Medicare risk contracting.健康维护组织(HMO)医疗保险风险合同的新按人头付费方案。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 Feb;51(2):35-6, 38.
9
Discretionary hospital use and diagnostic risk adjustment of Medicare HMO capitation rates.医疗保险健康维护组织(HMO)人头费率的酌情医院使用情况及诊断风险调整
Inquiry. 2000 Summer;37(2):162-72.
10
Getting ready for capitation: prepare, prepare, prepare.
J Healthc Resour Manag. 1995 Sep;13(9):26, 29-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Linked Data Analysis of Dually Eligible Beneficiaries in New England.新英格兰地区双重资格受益人的关联数据分析
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Winter;20(2):91-108.
2
Health-Based Payment for HIV/AIDS in Medicaid Managed Care Programs.医疗补助管理式医疗项目中基于健康状况的艾滋病病毒/艾滋病支付方式。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1998 Spring;19(3):1-20.
3
Fixing flaws in Medicare drug coverage that prompt insurers to avoid low-income patients.解决医疗保险药品覆盖范围中的缺陷,这些缺陷促使保险公司避开低收入患者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Dec;29(12):2335-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0323. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
4
Distributing $800 billion: an early assessment of Medicare Part D risk adjustment.分配8000亿美元:对医疗保险D部分风险调整的早期评估。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):215-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.215.
5
A matter of classes: stratifying health care populations to produce better estimates of inpatient costs.分类问题:对医疗人群进行分层以更准确地估算住院费用。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):1217-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00393.x.
6
Evaluating selection out of health plans for Medicaid beneficiaries with substance abuse.评估医疗补助计划中药物滥用的医疗补助受益人的医保计划选择情况。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):78-92. doi: 10.1007/BF02287814.
7
Do adjusted clinical groups eliminate incentives for HMOs to avoid substance abusers? Evidence from the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program.调整后的临床分组能否消除健康维护组织(HMO)规避药物滥用者的动机?来自马里兰州医疗补助健康选择计划的证据。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):63-77. doi: 10.1007/BF02287813.
8
A structural equation modeling approach to examining the predictive power of determinants of individuals' health expenditures.一种用于检验个人医疗支出决定因素预测能力的结构方程建模方法。
J Med Syst. 2002 Aug;26(4):323-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1015868720789.
9
Patient protection and risk selection: do primary care physicians encourage their patients to join or avoid capitated health plans according to the patient's health status?患者保护与风险选择:初级保健医生是否会根据患者的健康状况鼓励他们加入或避免加入按人头付费的健康计划?
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jan;17(1):40-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10349.x.
10
Risk adjustment alternatives in paying for behavioral health care under Medicaid.医疗补助计划下行为健康护理付费中的风险调整替代方案。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;36(4):793-811.