Phillips Susan D, Kramer Teresa L, Compton Scott N, Burns Barbara J, Robbins James M
Services Effectiveness Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3454, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan-Feb;30(1):125-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02287818.
Case-mix adjustment methods are needed to account for differences between providers when the youth they treat have characteristics that adversely affect treatment success. This study explores variables for adjusting mental health treatment outcomes for adolescents and the differential effects of case-mix adjustment on providers' performance. Linear regression modeling was used to identify case-mix variables for five outcomes. Predictive equations for each outcome were developed for models based on intake clinical data alone, clinical data plus administrative data, and clinical data plus data describing youth history and family environment. Variance explained by intake clinical data alone did not increase appreciably with the addition of administrative data or data describing youth history and family environment. Adjusting outcomes changed the relative performance of certain individual providers substantially, but had a more moderate impact on the overall interpretation of providers' performance.
当接受治疗的青少年具有对治疗成功产生不利影响的特征时,需要采用病例组合调整方法来考虑不同提供者之间的差异。本研究探讨了用于调整青少年心理健康治疗结果的变量,以及病例组合调整对提供者绩效的不同影响。采用线性回归模型来确定五个结果的病例组合变量。基于仅摄入临床数据、临床数据加管理数据以及临床数据加描述青少年病史和家庭环境的数据,为每个结果建立了预测方程。仅摄入临床数据所解释的方差,在添加管理数据或描述青少年病史和家庭环境的数据后并没有显著增加。调整结果大幅改变了某些个体提供者的相对绩效,但对提供者绩效的总体解读影响更为适度。