Riopelle Arthur J
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.
J Gen Psychol. 2003 Jan;130(1):47-57. doi: 10.1080/00221300309601273.
The author compared simulations of the "true" null hypothesis (zeta) test, in which sigma was known and fixed, with the t test, in which s, an estimate of sigma, was calculated from the sample because the t test was used to emulate the "true" test. The true null hypothesis test bears exclusively on calculating the probability that a sample distance (mean) is larger than a specified value. The results showed that the value of t was sensitive to sampling fluctuations in both distance and standard error. Large values of t reflect small standard errors when n is small. The value of t achieves sensitivity primarily to distance only when the sample sizes are large. One cannot make a definitive statement about the probability or "significance" of a distance solely on the basis of the value of t.
作者将“真实”零假设(ζ)检验的模拟情况(其中σ已知且固定)与t检验进行了比较。在t检验中,由于要用t检验来模拟“真实”检验,所以要根据样本计算σ的估计值s。真实零假设检验专门用于计算样本距离(均值)大于指定值的概率。结果表明,t值对距离和标准误差中的抽样波动都很敏感。当n较小时,t值较大反映出标准误差较小。只有当样本量较大时,t值才主要对距离具有敏感性。仅根据t值不能对距离的概率或“显著性”做出明确的判断。