Stegaru B, Schaumann H J, Kollmeier W, Neuss H
Med Klin. 1976 Apr 2;71(14):573-9.
In a controlled study two groups of patients with acute myocardial infarction were compared. One group consisted of 75 patients who were early mobilized; a control group of 38 patients was treated conservatively. Although the early mobilized patients showed a slightly increased stress on the hemodynamics these findings had no clinical significance: the complication rate in this group was not higher than in the conservatively treated patients. The main advantage of early mobilization however as compared to conservative treatment seems to be the prognostically and psychologically favourable effect especially with respect to rehabilitation.
在一项对照研究中，对两组急性心肌梗死患者进行了比较。一组由75例早期活动的患者组成；另一组38例患者作为对照组接受保守治疗。尽管早期活动的患者血流动力学压力略有增加，但这些结果并无临床意义：该组的并发症发生率并不高于接受保守治疗的患者。然而，与保守治疗相比，早期活动的主要优势似乎在于对预后和心理方面有积极影响，尤其是在康复方面。
